Skip to content

chore(deps): upgrade Rslint to v0.8.0 - #73

Open
chenjiahan wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/upgrade-rslint-0.8
Open

chore(deps): upgrade Rslint to v0.8.0#73
chenjiahan wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/upgrade-rslint-0.8

Conversation

@chenjiahan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

  • Upgrade @rslint/core to v0.8.0 and refresh the lockfile where applicable.
  • Preserve the existing recommended-rule coverage under Rslint 0.8.
  • Resolve newly surfaced lint diagnostics where needed.
  • Verify the relevant lint checks pass.

Related Links

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: adb0366936

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread rslint.config.ts
{
files: ['playground/**/*'],
rules: {
'no-undef': 'off',

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Declare browser globals instead of disabling no-undef

When playground JavaScript contains a misspelled or otherwise undeclared identifier, this subtree-wide override makes lint pass because it disables no-undef merely to accommodate the browser-provided document used in playground/src/index.js. This removes recommended-rule coverage and allows broken demo code into CI; configure the browser global or narrowly suppress that specific use while retaining the rule.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant