Skip to content

Update 3.2 release blog post in prep for tomorrow’s release. #63

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Feb 3, 2015

Conversation

myronmarston
Copy link
Member

This is most of the blog post that I'll be publishing tomorrow after releasing 3.2. There are still a few TODOs but I'm done with it for the night -- the rest I'll wrap up tomorrow.

I don't want to hold back the release of 3.2 or the publishing of this post based on waiting for a review so I plan to merge and deploy this tomorrow regardless of if anyone reviews it or not...but if any one wants to, feel free and I'll revise based on feedback.


RSpec continues to be a community-driven project with contributors
from all over the world. This release includes 647 commits from 190
pull requests from 47 different contributors.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Wow, really?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actually the numbers are even higher (see stats below). This is copied in from the 3.1 release post. I plan to update it and/or rewrite this section.

@JonRowe
Copy link
Member

JonRowe commented Feb 3, 2015

I skimmed this, looks good though


### Core: Pending Example Output Includes Failure Details

RSpec 3.0 shipped with new semantics for `pending`: rather than
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Replace ':' with a period? Seems like a sentence break instead of a definition.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed.

@myronmarston
Copy link
Member Author

OK, I updated it some more. This is what I plan to publish tomorrow (sans replacing some bits that are generated by rspec-dev rake tasks).

myronmarston added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 3, 2015
Update 3.2 release blog post in prep for tomorrow’s release.
@myronmarston myronmarston merged commit 8026a9a into source Feb 3, 2015
@myronmarston myronmarston deleted the rspec-3-2-release-post branch February 3, 2015 15:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants