remove "main" field from package.json #9
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
this doesn't actually do anything, and i think it's caused confusion for module authors who try to name their packages one thing and name their main .js file something else
|
Sound reasonable your point, but why dont rewrite this thing by script to create_new module. Can you explain me more about these module are you mention before. There some link where I can take a look. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
hey @roramirez afaik, MMM doesn't actually do anything with the
nameormainfields inpackage.json(right @MichMich?)and i think it's caused confusion for module authors who try to name their packages one thing and name their main .js file something else, and can't get things to load (i submitted PRs against two modules in the last few days where i had to fix this)
this would likely clear up some of the confusion