feat(rome_js_syntax): better api for picking jsx attributes

[xunilrj]

Summary

This PR try to simplify the API for retrieving JSX attributes.
Unfortunately, to achieve this it needs to use unsafe, because JsxAttribute is not Copy.

let [a, c, d] = list.find_attributes_by_name(["a", "c", "d"]);

Test Plan

cargo test -p rome_js_analyze -- find_attributes_by_name 

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for rometools canceled.

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	55c7cae
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/rometools/deploys/6352a529e308860008bbb364

[github-actions]

Parser conformance results on ubuntu-latest

js/262

Test result	main count	This PR count	Difference
Total	45879	45879	0
Passed	44939	44939	0
Failed	940	940	0
Panics	0	0	0
Coverage	97.95%	97.95%	0.00%

jsx/babel

Test result	main count	This PR count	Difference
Total	39	39	0
Passed	36	36	0
Failed	3	3	0
Panics	0	0	0
Coverage	92.31%	92.31%	0.00%

symbols/microsoft

Test result	main count	This PR count	Difference
Total	5946	5946	0
Passed	1621	1621	0
Failed	4325	4325	0
Panics	0	0	0
Coverage	27.26%	27.26%	0.00%

ts/babel

Test result	main count	This PR count	Difference
Total	588	588	0
Passed	519	519	0
Failed	69	69	0
Panics	0	0	0
Coverage	88.27%	88.27%	0.00%

ts/microsoft

Test result	main count	This PR count	Difference
Total	16257	16257	0
Passed	12395	12395	0
Failed	3862	3862	0
Panics	0	0	0
Coverage	76.24%	76.24%	0.00%

[github-actions]

Playground for commit deafd44

[MichaReiser]

Why is it necessary that N is smaller than 16?

[xunilrj]

Just to put a safeguard, given that everything is allocated on the stack.

[ematipico]

Would you mind add a comment to explain why? I personally don't know why that is safe and against what. That would be appreciated

[xunilrj]

Done.