Skip to content

rocketdeploy-dev/showcase-ops-layer-for-woocommerce

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

3 Commits
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

This repository is a reference architecture showcase extracted from a real, production system. It focuses on architectural decisions, boundaries, and operational patterns — not on business-specific logic or a ready-to-deploy plugin.

The full system context, constraints, and outcomes are described in the corresponding case study: 👉 https://rocketdeploy.dev/en/case-studies/ops-layer-for-woocommerce

Overview

  • This plugin is an admin extension for a CMS-driven commerce site, designed to coordinate internal operational workflows with role-aware access.
  • It provides operator-facing screens, API endpoints, and document generation helpers to support day-to-day operational tasks in a controlled environment.
  • This document intentionally omits business rules, pricing logic, customer data, and any domain-sensitive workflows.

Start here (reading map)

  • Plugin bootstrap file (root PHP entry point): registers hooks, loads modules, and defines version/constants.
  • Admin menu and settings module: wires configuration screens and persists options.
  • Admin dashboard module: aggregates counts for dashboards and widgets.
  • Operator REST controller: exposes endpoints for list views and action-based transitions.
  • Install/upgrade module: manages schema setup and role/capability changes.
  • Document generation module: renders templates and produces PDFs or similar artifacts.
  • Template layer (admin + documents): declarative views that receive sanitized data.
  • Asset bundles (admin UI): front-end code for panels and widgets.

Architecture at a glance

+--------------------------+        +-----------------------------+        +-----------------------------+
| CMS Integration Layer    |  ----> | Core / Application Layer    |  ----> | Infrastructure / Adapters   |
| - hooks & admin menus    |        | - workflow services         |        | - CMS DB (entities/meta)    |
| - REST controllers       |        | - validation / policy       |        | - object storage (optional) |
| - templates & assets     |        | - document generation       |        | - third-party libraries     |
+--------------------------+        +-----------------------------+        +-----------------------------+
  • CMS integration layer adapts platform hooks, admin screens, and API requests into internal actions.
  • Core/application layer hosts reusable workflow logic and shared validations with minimal I/O.
  • Infrastructure/adapters encapsulate storage, external integrations, and library-specific concerns.

Architecture boundaries

  • Boundary rule: Only the CMS integration layer may call platform APIs (hooks, option storage, entity APIs).
  • Boundary rule: Core/application code must remain framework-agnostic and operate on plain data structures.
  • Boundary rule: Infrastructure/adapters can call external libraries and storage APIs, but should not contain business rules.
  • Enforcement today: Boundaries are enforced by file placement and call patterns (controllers call services; services call helpers/adapters).
  • Known coupling: Some helper utilities still call platform functions directly, creating lightweight coupling that should be isolated over time.

Module map

  • Plugin bootstrap: Defines constants, loads modules, and registers hooks/activation logic.
  • Shared helpers: Cross-cutting utilities for sanitization, formatting, and common data shaping.
  • Admin layer: Menus, settings, dashboards, and access bridge for admin-only workflows.
  • Operator panels: REST controllers and request handlers for operator actions and list views.
  • Order/admin UI extensions: List columns, bulk actions, and metabox UI enhancements.
  • Document pipeline: Data shaping, template rendering, and PDF generation via libraries.
  • Object storage adapter (optional): Request signing and storage integration for artifacts.
  • Templates: Admin and document templates, with data passed in from controllers/services.
  • Assets: Admin UI JavaScript/CSS bundles for panels and widgets.
  • Localization: Translation catalog for user-facing strings.

Execution flows (generic)

  1. Operator panel data fetch

    • Trigger: API endpoint invoked by admin UI.
    • Validation/auth: Permission callback validates role/capability and sanitizes query params.
    • Core use-case invoked: Query summaries and lists based on current workflow state.
    • Side effects: None (read-only), optional lightweight caching.
    • Observability: Consistent error responses and platform logging where enabled.
    • Evidence:
      • Operator REST controller for list endpoints.
      • Admin dashboard aggregation module.
  2. State transition action

    • Trigger: API endpoint for an action (e.g., confirm/undo/mark) invoked by an operator panel.
    • Validation/auth: Capability checks plus input validation and idempotency guards.
    • Core use-case invoked: Apply state transition and record an operator event.
    • Side effects: Updates entity meta/state and appends to an internal event log table.
    • Observability: Errors handled via structured API responses; events stored for audit trails.
    • Evidence:
      • Operator REST controller for action endpoints.
      • Operator events logging module.
  3. Document generation

    • Trigger: Admin post action from an admin screen or bulk action.
    • Validation/auth: Nonce and capability checks before generating files.
    • Core use-case invoked: Render HTML template and generate a document artifact.
    • Side effects: Stores generated artifacts and updates metadata flags when applicable.
    • Observability: Errors surfaced to admin UI; optional adapter logging.
    • Evidence:
      • Admin post handler for document generation.
      • Document rendering/generation module.
  4. Dashboard counters

    • Trigger: API endpoints backing dashboard widgets.
    • Validation/auth: Role/capability checks plus minimal input validation.
    • Core use-case invoked: Aggregate counts by status or workflow stage.
    • Side effects: None; read-only queries.
    • Observability: Standard API error response format.
    • Evidence:
      • Admin dashboard module.
      • Shared query helper utilities.
  5. Install/upgrade

    • Trigger: Plugin activation or version check on load.
    • Validation/auth: Activation hook (administrator context).
    • Core use-case invoked: Create/upgrade event table and ensure role capabilities.
    • Side effects: Writes to options and database schema.
    • Observability: Follows platform upgrade routines; failures surface as admin notices.
    • Evidence:
      • Install/upgrade module for schema and role setup.
      • Bootstrap file registering activation hooks.

Data & state management

  • State is stored in CMS primitives: entity meta for per-entity state, options for configuration, and a custom event-history table.
  • Event history is modeled as append-only records with columns for entity reference, actor reference, event type, optional metadata payload, and timestamps.
  • State transitions are guarded by checks that prevent duplicates and enforce allowable transitions.
  • Migration/upgrade logic is centralized in an install/upgrade module that evolves schema and capability sets.

Reliability & operations

  • Error handling uses structured error objects and defensive checks; failures are surfaced to API clients or admin screens.
  • Idempotency is achieved via state guards and explicit markers to prevent duplicate processing.
  • Retry/backoff is minimal inside the plugin; external operations are designed to be re-invoked safely.
  • Logging is conservative and routed through platform facilities or adapter-level logging.

Security model (high-level)

  • Authentication and authorization are delegated to platform roles/capabilities and API permission callbacks.
  • Nonce validation is used for admin-post actions that mutate state.
  • Example (generic): "Only users with the operation-management capability may call the action endpoint; otherwise the request is rejected."
  • Secrets are stored in platform options and loaded only when integrations are enabled; values are never hard-coded.
  • Input validation uses platform sanitizers and strict checks for identifiers, dates, and text fields.

Key engineering decisions & trade-offs

  • Decision: Keep the CMS as the primary adapter layer. Why: Leverages platform hooks, roles, and admin UI. Trade-off: Tighter coupling to the platform lifecycle. Risk: Harder to test core logic in isolation. Mitigation: Extract pure functions for validation and state mapping.
  • Decision: Use API endpoints for operator panels. Why: Enables responsive UIs and decouples views from logic. Trade-off: Requires careful permission callbacks and request validation. Risk: Elevated attack surface for admin endpoints. Mitigation: Centralize permission checks and input sanitization.
  • Decision: Record operator events in a dedicated table. Why: Provides a durable audit trail and efficient querying. Trade-off: Schema migrations must be maintained across versions. Risk: Drift between code and schema. Mitigation: Versioned migrations via install/upgrade module.
  • Decision: Store workflow state in entity meta. Why: Aligns with existing entities without duplicating records. Trade-off: Meta-heavy queries can be less performant. Risk: Query performance degradation as data grows. Mitigation: Limit meta queries and add targeted indexes when needed.
  • Decision: Bundle document libraries locally. Why: Ensures consistent rendering without external service dependencies. Trade-off: Larger plugin footprint. Risk: Library updates lag behind security fixes. Mitigation: Maintain a routine dependency review schedule.
  • Decision: Provide optional object storage integration. Why: Allows offloading artifacts without hard dependency on external systems. Trade-off: Additional configuration complexity. Risk: Misconfiguration leading to failed uploads. Mitigation: Readiness checks and clear admin diagnostics.
  • Decision: Implement role-based access for multiple operator panels. Why: Enforces least-privilege access by function. Trade-off: Capability maintenance on upgrades. Risk: Permission drift after updates. Mitigation: Re-apply capabilities during version checks.
  • Decision: Centralize validation in shared helpers. Why: Consistent sanitization and normalization. Trade-off: Shared helpers may become a coupling point. Risk: Hidden dependencies across modules. Mitigation: Keep helpers stateless and narrowly scoped.
  • Decision: Use a single event log schema for multiple actions. Why: Simplifies auditing and reporting. Trade-off: Requires flexible metadata storage. Risk: Overuse of unstructured payloads. Mitigation: Define stable metadata keys and document them.
  • Decision: Provide admin-post flows for document generation. Why: Aligns with platform admin conventions. Trade-off: Less suitable for long-running tasks. Risk: Timeouts for large batches. Mitigation: Encourage batch sizing and surface warnings.
  • Decision: Keep templates thin and data-driven. Why: Minimizes logic in views. Trade-off: More logic in controllers/services. Risk: Controller bloat. Mitigation: Split data shaping into small helper functions.
  • Decision: Outside the CMS, use a service layer with dependency injection. Why: Improves testability and module boundaries. Trade-off: Additional setup complexity. Risk: Over-engineering for small deployments. Mitigation: Provide a minimal default container.
  • Decision: Outside the CMS, store events in a dedicated analytics store. Why: Enables advanced querying and retention policies. Trade-off: Added infrastructure dependencies. Risk: Operational overhead. Mitigation: Provide a fallback in the primary database.

How to evaluate this codebase (for reviewers)

  • Start with the plugin bootstrap to understand which modules are loaded and which hooks are registered.
  • Trace API endpoints in operator panels and dashboard modules to see how requests map to core actions.
  • Review the install/upgrade routines to understand database tables and capability management.
  • Focus on how state changes are validated and recorded rather than the business-specific meaning of states.
  • Note that domain-specific status labels, business rules, and operational procedures are intentionally omitted here.

What would be extracted into a public reference implementation

  • Modules to extract:
    • core/: workflow engine, validation, and event recording.
    • adapters/: persistence adapter, logging adapter, storage adapter.
    • api/: HTTP controllers with permission hooks.
    • ui/: minimal admin UI and templates.
    • docs/: architecture and usage notes.
  • Responsibilities:
    • Core defines domain-agnostic state transitions and event recording.
    • Adapters map core interfaces to platform APIs and storage backends.
    • API layer exposes endpoints with explicit permission checks and input validation.
    • UI layer renders admin views and consumes API endpoints.
  • Target folder structure (reference):
reference-plugin/
  core/
    workflows/
    validation/
    events/
  adapters/
    cms/
    storage/
    logging/
  api/
    controllers/
    routes/
  ui/
    admin/
    templates/
  docs/
    architecture.md
    usage.md

If you’re dealing with a similar problem — complex operational workflows, CMS constraints, or systems that must work reliably beyond standard admin panels — feel free to reach out:

👉 https://rocketdeploy.dev/en/contact