Consider making the plugin stricter #11
Description
Currently the plugin ignores any lines inside the codeinclude section that it does not recognize as include statements (also considering #10). It might result in various typos remaining undetected as the docs build successfully.
Possible issues with the permissive (current) approach:
- A totally invalid include statement is ignored, a snippet is skipped (likely, rare).
- An invalid targeting expression is ignored, a whole file is included instead of a particular part (more likely).
- No matches for a given syntactically correct targeting expression, a whole file is included instead (possibly, separate issue).