Skip to content

Conversation

@NathanFlurry
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@railway-app
Copy link

railway-app bot commented Jan 22, 2026

🚅 Deployed to the rivet-pr-4009 environment in rivet-frontend

Service Status Web Updated (UTC)
frontend-inspector 😴 Sleeping (View Logs) Web Jan 22, 2026 at 8:55 am
frontend-cloud 😴 Sleeping (View Logs) Web Jan 22, 2026 at 8:50 am
website 😴 Sleeping (View Logs) Web Jan 22, 2026 at 8:49 am
mcp-hub ❌ Build Failed (View Logs) Web Jan 22, 2026 at 8:13 am

Copy link
Member Author

Warning

This pull request is not mergeable via GitHub because a downstack PR is open. Once all requirements are satisfied, merge this PR as a stack on Graphite.
Learn more


How to use the Graphite Merge Queue

Add the label merge-queue to this PR to add it to the merge queue.

You must have a Graphite account in order to use the merge queue. Sign up using this link.

An organization admin has enabled the Graphite Merge Queue in this repository.

Please do not merge from GitHub as this will restart CI on PRs being processed by the merge queue.

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

@claude
Copy link

claude bot commented Jan 22, 2026

Effect Integration Review

This PR adds comprehensive Effect.ts integration to RivetKit, enabling functional programming patterns with robust error handling. Overall, the implementation is well-structured and follows Effect best practices. Here are my findings:


Strengths

  1. Clean Architecture

    • Well-organized namespace pattern for lifecycle hooks (e.g., OnCreate, OnWake, Run)
    • Consistent API design across all Effect wrappers
    • Good separation between core integration (rivetkit-typescript/packages/effect) and examples
  2. Type Safety

    • Proper use of Effect's type system with generic constraints
    • Correct YieldWrap usage for Effect generators
    • Type-safe context propagation via ActorContextTag
  3. Good Examples

    • fetch-actor.ts demonstrates multi-step workflows with error handling
    • queue-processor.ts shows long-running background processing patterns
    • Examples use proper Effect patterns like Effect.either for error recovery
  4. Test Coverage

    • Basic test coverage for Effect-wrapped actors
    • Tests verify state management and broadcasting work correctly

🔍 Issues & Concerns

Critical Issues

1. Missing Error Handling in waitUntil (rivetkit-typescript/packages/effect/src/actor.ts:282-283)

The .then(() => {}) swallows errors from the Effect execution. If the Effect fails, the error is silently lost.

Recommendation: Handle errors explicitly or let them propagate.

2. Unsafe Type Casts (rivetkit-typescript/packages/effect/src/actor.ts:187, 213, etc.)

Multiple instances of (c as any) casts, particularly around c.queue access. This bypasses type safety.

Recommendation: Define proper types for queue context or use type guards.

Medium Priority Issues

3. Inconsistent waitUntil Usage

  • actor.ts:effect() (lines 282-283) uses waitUntil for durability
  • action.ts:effect() (line 55) does NOT use waitUntil

Question: Is this intentional? If actions need durability, they should also use waitUntil. If not, document why.

4. Queue Type Safety (rivetkit-typescript/packages/effect/src/queue.ts)

The queue property is accessed via type cast. This should be properly typed.

5. Test Coverage Gaps

  • No tests for lifecycle hooks (OnCreate, OnDestroy, etc.)
  • No tests for error scenarios
  • No tests for queue processing

Recommendation: Add tests for error propagation through Effect chains and lifecycle hook execution order.

Minor Issues

6. Missing JSDoc Comments

Core utilities like effect(), updateState(), etc. lack documentation.

7. Duplicate effect Function

Defined in both actor.ts (line 247) and action.ts (line 18). The action.ts version accepts variadic args, actor.ts doesn't.


📝 Code Quality Observations

Following CLAUDE.md Guidelines

  • ✅ Imports at top of file (not inline)
  • ✅ Lowercase log messages
  • ✅ Good structured logging with context objects
  • ✅ Uses workspace dependencies (effect as peer dependency)

📋 Recommendations Summary

Must Fix (Before Merge):

  1. Fix error handling in waitUntil (actor.ts:282-283)
  2. Remove or properly type all as any casts
  3. Clarify waitUntil usage consistency between actor/action effects

Should Fix (Before Merge):
4. Add JSDoc documentation to public APIs
5. Improve test coverage (lifecycle, errors, queues)

Nice to Have:
6. Strengthen ActorContextTag typing
7. Document performance characteristics
8. Add examples for error recovery patterns


Overall Assessment

This is a solid foundation for Effect integration. The API design is clean and follows Effect conventions well. The main concerns are around error handling safety and type safety with the as any casts. Once those are addressed, this will be a valuable addition to RivetKit.

Recommendation: Request changes for critical issues, then approve after fixes.


Review generated by Claude Code - Analyzed 32 files with focus on rivetkit-typescript/packages/effect/

@NathanFlurry NathanFlurry force-pushed the 01-22-feat_rivetkit_effect_effect_support branch from cfba0e4 to 88c2883 Compare January 22, 2026 08:28
@railway-app railway-app bot temporarily deployed to rivet-frontend / rivet-pr-4009 January 22, 2026 08:28 Destroyed
@NathanFlurry NathanFlurry force-pushed the 01-22-feat_rivetkit_effect_effect_support branch from 88c2883 to bd1b371 Compare January 22, 2026 08:34
@NathanFlurry NathanFlurry force-pushed the 01-22-feat_rivetkit_effect_effect_support branch from bd1b371 to acb5eb3 Compare January 22, 2026 08:39
@railway-app railway-app bot temporarily deployed to rivet-frontend / rivet-pr-4009 January 22, 2026 08:39 Destroyed
@pkg-pr-new
Copy link

pkg-pr-new bot commented Jan 22, 2026

More templates

@rivetkit/cloudflare-workers

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivet/@rivetkit/cloudflare-workers@4009

@rivetkit/db

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivet/@rivetkit/db@4009

@rivetkit/effect

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivet/@rivetkit/effect@4009

@rivetkit/framework-base

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivet/@rivetkit/framework-base@4009

@rivetkit/next-js

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivet/@rivetkit/next-js@4009

@rivetkit/react

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivet/@rivetkit/react@4009

rivetkit

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivet/rivetkit@4009

@rivetkit/sql-loader

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivet/@rivetkit/sql-loader@4009

@rivetkit/virtual-websocket

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivet/@rivetkit/virtual-websocket@4009

@rivetkit/engine-runner

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivet/@rivetkit/engine-runner@4009

@rivetkit/engine-runner-protocol

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivet/@rivetkit/engine-runner-protocol@4009

commit: 3bc91d9

Comment on lines +1 to +3
import { Effect } from "effect";
import { actor } from "rivetkit";
import { Action, Run, Log, Queue } from "@rivetkit/effect";
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The imports should be sorted alphabetically to comply with Biome linter rules. Change to: import { Action, Log, Queue, Run } from '@rivetkit/effect'; import { Effect } from 'effect'; import { actor } from 'rivetkit';

Spotted by Graphite Agent (based on CI logs)

Fix in Graphite


Is this helpful? React 👍 or 👎 to let us know.

Comment on lines +1 to +3
import { Data, Effect } from "effect";
import { actor } from "rivetkit";
import { Action, Log } from "@rivetkit/effect";
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Import sorting issue. Reorder imports to follow the project's convention: third-party imports first (alphabetically), then local imports.

Spotted by Graphite Agent (based on CI logs)

Fix in Graphite


Is this helpful? React 👍 or 👎 to let us know.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants