Skip to content

Conversation

@NathanFlurry
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@railway-app
Copy link

railway-app bot commented Jan 17, 2026

🚅 Deployed to the rivet-pr-3968 environment in rivet-frontend

Service Status Web Updated (UTC)
frontend-inspector 😴 Sleeping (View Logs) Web Jan 24, 2026 at 8:23 am
frontend-cloud 😴 Sleeping (View Logs) Web Jan 24, 2026 at 7:48 am
website ❌ Build Failed (View Logs) Web Jan 17, 2026 at 6:06 am

Copy link
Member Author

Warning

This pull request is not mergeable via GitHub because a downstack PR is open. Once all requirements are satisfied, merge this PR as a stack on Graphite.
Learn more


How to use the Graphite Merge Queue

Add the label merge-queue to this PR to add it to the merge queue.

You must have a Graphite account in order to use the merge queue. Sign up using this link.

An organization admin has enabled the Graphite Merge Queue in this repository.

Please do not merge from GitHub as this will restart CI on PRs being processed by the merge queue.

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

@claude
Copy link

claude bot commented Jan 17, 2026

Pull Request Review

This PR makes a small but important fix to the hello-world example's API routing configuration for development environments.

Summary

The changes add serverless basePath configuration to the actor registry setup and clean up the index.ts file by removing commented code and unnecessary whitespace.

Code Quality

  • Clean, minimal changes that directly address the routing issue
  • Removes commented-out code and extra whitespace, improving maintainability
  • The basePath configuration is correctly placed in the registry setup

Observations

  1. Consistency consideration: The basePath configuration is now only present in the hello-world example. Other examples like react and cloudflare-workers-hono don't have this configuration. Worth verifying if other examples need similar updates.

  2. Documentation opportunity: Consider if the EXAMPLE_TEMPLATE.md or example README should document when/why the basePath configuration is needed.

Dependencies

The vite-plugin-srvx dependency update from @312eeb8 to @7 appears to be a version alignment. This looks fine, though the PR title doesn't mention this dependency update.

Testing

No tests are modified, which is expected for example code. Manual testing should verify that the /rivet/* routes work correctly in dev mode and that the basePath configuration properly aligns with the Hono route pattern.

Security and Performance

No security or performance concerns identified.

Suggestions

  1. Optional: Consider adding a comment explaining why basePath is needed
  2. Follow-up: Review if other examples need similar basePath configuration for consistency

Verdict

The changes are solid and straightforward. The code quality is good, and the cleanup improves readability. Approved with minor suggestions for consideration.

@pkg-pr-new
Copy link

pkg-pr-new bot commented Jan 17, 2026

More templates

@rivetkit/cloudflare-workers

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivet/@rivetkit/cloudflare-workers@3968

@rivetkit/db

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivet/@rivetkit/db@3968

@rivetkit/framework-base

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivet/@rivetkit/framework-base@3968

@rivetkit/next-js

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivet/@rivetkit/next-js@3968

@rivetkit/react

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivet/@rivetkit/react@3968

rivetkit

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivet/rivetkit@3968

@rivetkit/sql-loader

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivet/@rivetkit/sql-loader@3968

@rivetkit/virtual-websocket

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivet/@rivetkit/virtual-websocket@3968

@rivetkit/engine-runner

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivet/@rivetkit/engine-runner@3968

@rivetkit/engine-runner-protocol

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivet/@rivetkit/engine-runner-protocol@3968

commit: 74802e5

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants