Introduce ArchetypeInfo struct
#2778
Labels
Comments
teh-cmc
added
🦀 Rust API
3 tasks
Wumpf
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 28, 2023
The `points2d` and `points3d` views are now both implemented in terms of
the new components (that was already the case for points2d).
---
This PR removes all of these:
- `DrawOrder`
- `Point2D`
- `Point3D`
- `Radius`
- `InstanceKey`
and deprecates all of those:
- `Color`
- `Label`
- `ClassId`
- `KeypointId`
The reason these last four are merely deprecated rather than removed
entirely is that the legacy `AnnotationContext` depends on them, and
more specifically depends on their respective implementations of
`arrow2-convert`'s traits.
Still, they have been confined into tight corners as much as possible.
The deprecated type are prefixed with `Legacy`, e.g. `LegacyLabel`.
In particular, `ColorRGBA` is now `LegacyColor`.
In Rust, the new components aren't hidden behind an `experimental`
module anymore, instead they are transparently merged with the rest of
the components.
---
The _new_ `Point2D` component implements the _old_ `LegacyComponent`
trait to allow all of the old `re_query` test suites to continue
working, until we remove them all soon.
---
The legacy point logging APIs, `log_point` & `log_points`, have been
rewritten in terms of the `Points2D` & `Points3D` archetypes.
In order to do so, I had to make their `position` argument mandatory,
i.e. you can _not_ write this anymore: `rr.log_points("a/b/c",
colors=[red, red, blue])`.
This is _not_ a problem for two reasons:
1. This won't ever see the light of release anyway, since this PR marks
the cutoff point of 0.8, and this code must be removed in order to
release 0.9 (assuming 0.9 is the release of HOPE).
2. This [never worked to begin
with](https://github.com/rerun-io/rerun/blob/main/rerun_py/rerun_sdk/rerun/log/points.py#L225-L226),
so we know for a fact that no one ever relied on that behavior anyhow.
---
cc @Wumpf, the [custom view
example](https://github.com/rerun-io/rerun/pull/2768/files#diff-a0e8c8b731114ee9364c99840046c1aeea03fd2ea92479fc139bd81202db1da0)
got a bit more verbose and should get much much better once we tackle
#2778. We could also just modify it to use an existing archetype instead
(which would have to be either `Points2D` or `Points3D` at the moment).
---
Fixes #2790
### What
### Checklist
* [x] I have read and agree to [Contributor
Guide](https://github.com/rerun-io/rerun/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) and
the [Code of
Conduct](https://github.com/rerun-io/rerun/blob/main/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md)
* [x] I've included a screenshot or gif (if applicable)
* [x] I have tested [demo.rerun.io](https://demo.rerun.io/pr/2768) (if
applicable)
- [PR Build Summary](https://build.rerun.io/pr/2768)
- [Docs
preview](https://rerun.io/preview/pr%3Acmc%2Fgoodbye_old_point/docs)
- [Examples
preview](https://rerun.io/preview/pr%3Acmc%2Fgoodbye_old_point/examples)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
This static struct would contain all the metadata associated with an
Archetype(name, required/recommended/optional components, required sizes for static arrays, etc).It is codegen'd and supersedes the temporary
ArchetypeDefinition.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: