Skip to content

Add image signature preflight pattern #71

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

crdant
Copy link
Member

@crdant crdant commented Jun 4, 2025

TL;DR

Documents a pattern for checking images signatures in a preflight check

Details

Provides a pattern for checking images signatures in a preflight check.
Currently documents it for only one image, but it's easy to extend to
incorporate multiple images with a little bit of Helm templating.

TL;DR
-----

Documents a pattern for checking images signatures in a preflight check

Details
-------

Provides a pattern for checking images signatures in a preflight check.
Currently documents it for only one image, but it's easy to extend to
incorporate multiple images with a little bit of Helm templating.
@0xJMart
Copy link
Member

0xJMart commented Jun 13, 2025

We'll approve as soon as the CPU limits are addressed!

Copy link
Member

@banjoh banjoh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I like this pattern.

Future consideration: It would be good if https://troubleshoot.sh/ would have a collector/analyser that uses https://pkg.go.dev/github.com/sigstore/cosign/v2 instead of running a pod.

@crdant
Copy link
Member Author

crdant commented Jun 13, 2025

I'm working on one 😉

@crdant crdant force-pushed the feature/crdant/adds-pattern-for-images-signature-preflight-check branch from fe6c46d to b426cb9 Compare June 13, 2025 18:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants