-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 893
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Upgrade remark-parse #260
Upgrade remark-parse #260
Conversation
Wow, not a fan of the markup that
EDIT: I read that backwards -- the markup is now cleaner. |
@rexxars would you have a chance to check this out? I upgraded |
Hurrah! It passes! |
This is a breaking change, since we are no longer getting a Remark has changed their list handling and thus we need to reflect this in our renderers by doing similar to mdast-util-to-hast This PR currently just handles all lists as if they were "tight", which isn't necessarily what people want. |
Darn. Beyond the other changes necessary, does this mean you'd want to make a major version bump or forgo upgrading remark? |
I don't really mind a breaking change if it makes sense, but as far as I can tell the functionality is still possible to reproduce with the latest remark, it just needs to be handled differently. I definitely don't want to remove a feature if it's supported by the underlying stack. |
I'm not sure what the next steps I should take are, so pending further direction I think I'll have to leave this to other contributors. |
Thanks for the PR, I'm scheduling the upgrade to remark-parse@6 for v5, which is in a separate branch right now: https://github.com/rexxars/react-markdown/tree/v5 |
Cool, looking forward to it. |
Unsure if this will break things on the
react-markdown
side. I wanted to see about upgrading remark (xref: nteract/nteract#3483).