Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update rehype-dom #5

Merged

Conversation

ChristianMurphy
Copy link
Member

Initial checklist

  • I read the support docs
  • I read the contributing guide
  • I agree to follow the code of conduct
  • I searched issues and couldn’t find anything (or linked relevant results below)
  • If applicable, I’ve added docs and tests

Description of changes

Updates rehype-dom to latest major version

temporary stackblitz link to verify
https://stackblitz.com/github/ChristianMurphy/.github-rehype/tree/docs/upgrade-rehype-dom-in-sandbox/sandbox-templates/rehype-dom-debug

@ChristianMurphy ChristianMurphy added 📚 area/docs This affects documentation 👩‍⚕ area/health This affects community labels Oct 6, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot added 👋 phase/new Post is being triaged automatically 🤞 phase/open Post is being triaged manually and removed 👋 phase/new Post is being triaged automatically labels Oct 6, 2023
@wooorm wooorm changed the title docs: upgrade rehype dom version used in example sandbox Update rehype-dom Oct 7, 2023
@wooorm wooorm merged commit 4397131 into rehypejs:main Oct 7, 2023
4 checks passed
@ChristianMurphy ChristianMurphy deleted the docs/upgrade-rehype-dom-in-sandbox branch October 7, 2023 15:13
@wooorm wooorm added the 💪 phase/solved Post is done label Oct 7, 2023
@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the 🤞 phase/open Post is being triaged manually label Oct 7, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
📚 area/docs This affects documentation 👩‍⚕ area/health This affects community 💪 phase/solved Post is done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants