Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs/using-react-redux: Fixes typo #1135

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 17, 2018
Merged

docs/using-react-redux: Fixes typo #1135

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 17, 2018

Conversation

jbizzle
Copy link
Contributor

@jbizzle jbizzle commented Dec 17, 2018

My first read of the docs as currently written is that they incorrectly use the term mapStateToProps instead of mapDispatchToProps in the answer to "Can I mapDispatchToProps without mapStateToProps in Redux?" This version fixes that, assuming my reading is correct.

… `mapStateToProps`

My first read of the docs as currently written is that they incorrectly use the term `mapStateToProps` instead of `mapDispatchToProps` in the answer to "Can I mapDispatchToProps without mapStateToProps in Redux?" This version fixes that, assuming my reading is correct.
@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Dec 17, 2018

Deploy preview for react-redux-docs ready!

Built with commit f41764a

https://deploy-preview-1135--react-redux-docs.netlify.com

@timdorr
Copy link
Member

timdorr commented Dec 17, 2018

Thanks!

@timdorr timdorr merged commit 94799ef into reduxjs:master Dec 17, 2018
albertodev7 pushed a commit to albertodev7/react-redux that referenced this pull request Dec 8, 2022
… `mapStateToProps` (reduxjs#1135)

My first read of the docs as currently written is that they incorrectly use the term `mapStateToProps` instead of `mapDispatchToProps` in the answer to "Can I mapDispatchToProps without mapStateToProps in Redux?" This version fixes that, assuming my reading is correct.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants