Uncaught TypeError: this.unsubscribe is not a function

[aaronjensen]

Occasionally, when clicking through our app we get this:

Is it possible for will unmount to fire before mount? Should we check to ensure unsubscribe is there before calling it or is something else going on?

[aaronjensen]

I believe this has to do w/ some incorrect stuff that was happening in the app, though I don't know exactly what yet. This may be something that should never normally happen.

[aaronjensen]

Ok, so here's what we were doing... in componentWillMount we fired an action via setTimeout so that the react-redux subscription in componentDidMount will have already happened by the time the action is dispatched. It appears that this is a bad idea, though I do not understand why.

[gaearon]

OK I introduced this bug while tweaking @gnoff's code. :-(
Will push out a fix soon.

[gaearon]

Can you verify the bug is fixed in 0.5.1?

[aaronjensen]

yep, it is. But then I get this:

Uncaught Error: Invariant Violation: Component (with keys: getDOMNode,_handleChange,props,context,state,refs,_reactInternalInstance) contains `render` method but is not mounted in the DOM

which makes me think we're doing something very wrong. By removing the setTimeout in componentWillMount it works out.

What's the right way to fire an action when a component mounts? If the action immediately modifies state, componentWillMount is too soon, because react-redux doesn't subscribe until componentDidMount...

[gaearon]

contains render method but is not mounted in the DOM

I found this: facebook/react#4233.

Sounds like React throws if you use findDOMNode(this) when component is already unmounted. You should clear any previously set interval in componentWillUnmount.

If the action immediately modifies state, componentWillMount is too soon, because react-redux doesn't subscribe until componentDidMount.

What do you mean by "too soon"? If React Redux doesn't update in some edge case, it's a bug, no matter where you call dispatch! You should file an issue, not just accept it like that. 😄

[aaronjensen]

I just assume that you've thought of everything and there's a good reason it is as it is! I'll make sure it is what I think it is and file an issue when I get a sec. Thanks!

[gaearon]

Keeping it open for now so I don't forget about it.
I make mistakes all the time, you should help me figure them out!

[gaearon]

Ideally, the fastest way to figure out a solution is to discuss a failing test. Can I ask you to contribute it?

[aaronjensen]

Looks like you beat me to it! feel free to close #31, thanks. Btw, is there a reason to do it this way instead of by subscribing in componentWillMount?