Skip to content

chore: bump package version#761

Merged
kurtdoherty merged 1 commit intomainfrom
chore-bump-package-version
Sep 9, 2025
Merged

chore: bump package version#761
kurtdoherty merged 1 commit intomainfrom
chore-bump-package-version

Conversation

@kurtdoherty
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@rpt-uk-github
Copy link

rpt-uk-github commented Sep 9, 2025

🎉 Snyk checks have passed. No issues have been found so far.

security/snyk check is complete. No issues have been found. (View Details)

license/snyk check is complete. No issues have been found. (View Details)

code/snyk check is complete. No issues have been found. (View Details)

@kurtdoherty kurtdoherty marked this pull request as ready for review September 9, 2025 21:12
@kurtdoherty kurtdoherty merged commit 7580180 into main Sep 9, 2025
4 of 5 checks passed
@kurtdoherty kurtdoherty deleted the chore-bump-package-version branch September 9, 2025 21:13
@codacy-production
Copy link

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation Diff coverage
Report missing for 1673d8c1
Coverage variation details
Coverable lines Covered lines Coverage
Common ancestor commit (1673d8c) Report Missing Report Missing Report Missing
Head commit (f858b62) 9204 8514 92.50%

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details
Coverable lines Covered lines Diff coverage
Pull request (#761) 0 0 ∅ (not applicable)

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

See your quality gate settings    Change summary preferences

Footnotes

  1. Codacy didn't receive coverage data for the commit, or there was an error processing the received data. Check your integration for errors and validate that your coverage setup is correct.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants