Skip to content

[Doppins] Upgrade dependency irc-upd to 0.6.2 #270

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 16, 2017

Conversation

doppins-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi!

A new version was just released of irc-upd, so Doppins
has upgraded your project's dependency ranges.

Make sure that it doesn't break anything, and happy merging! :shipit:


Upgraded irc-upd from 0.6.1 to 0.6.2

Changelog:

Version 0.6.2

Fixed bugs:

  • Fix reconnection by destroying the connection only when properly closed (and add a test for this)
  • Guard an error from showing when showErrors is false; relatedly use an 'out' object for error and debug messages to be less repetitive with guarding based on config values
  • Latest changelog version links now point to the right repository
  • Docs: fix formatting of a RFC2812 link
  • Remove unused jscs devDependency

Misc:

  • Make the 'non-latest' message (hopefully) less confusing, only show in debug mode
  • Update tape to ^4.7.0
  • Update eslint to ^4.2.0
  • Docs: clarify example message is an example
  • Docs: be consistent with phrasing around boolean config values
  • Add Node 8 to Travis builds

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jul 16, 2017

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 98.507% when pulling 531ea6b on doppins/irc-upd-equals-0.6.2 into 726100e on master.

@Throne3d
Copy link
Collaborator

Should fix #265?

@ekmartin ekmartin merged commit 3a1841c into master Jul 16, 2017
@ekmartin ekmartin deleted the doppins/irc-upd-equals-0.6.2 branch July 16, 2017 07:26
@ekmartin
Copy link
Member

@Throne3d wanna publish a patch release and close #265 afterwards?

@Throne3d
Copy link
Collaborator

(Done in #271.)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants