Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added overview Table for Streaming in Readme #104

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

stheid
Copy link

@stheid stheid commented Jan 4, 2021

  • Reordered "other" section to be last
  • added structured table for all tools for streaming and input sharing

- Reordered "other" section to be last
- added structured table for all tools for streaming and input sharing
@Ameb
Copy link
Member

Ameb commented Feb 20, 2021

I don't think that we want to change the list structure, adding a table would break with the guidelines.

@stheid
Copy link
Author

stheid commented Feb 22, 2021

the list structure is still there. the table is just additional.

Its your choice, but i would find it a pitty as the amount of projects regarding I/O is very large and its hard to get an overview.

have you had a look at the result? Currently its in conflict with master anyway.

If you opinion is definite, than you can reject the PR, otherwise i will attempt to fix the conflicts in the next couple of days.

@Ameb
Copy link
Member

Ameb commented Feb 22, 2021

My opinion should not be definitive, and it is as valid as yours. Other topics lack an overview (we have multiple launchers, multiple epub readers, many sync scripts/utilities). An overview might be possible as an extra item on each category, linking to another document (on this repo for example).

It is not the job of this repo to offer a comparison between tools because they can change over time and we aren't following every project as close

I'm slowly working on a migration into a static website (jekyll generated, using github pages) with tags for the items. I want to push a first version into my fork on the following days.

Give me a few weeks to publish the new site, and there the overview table will probably suit better. Don't worry about the conflicts, those are my bad for not reviewing pull requests in a timely manner.

@Eeems Eeems marked this pull request as draft October 17, 2023 19:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants