-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[doc][rllib] the rest of missing api references + lint checker #47114
Conversation
a9032fd
to
ca32a00
Compare
@@ -26,8 +26,7 @@ which maps agent IDs to a policy ID. | |||
by sub-classing either of the available, built-in classes, depending on your | |||
needs. | |||
|
|||
.. include:: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
fix this while i'm here to assist with the rst parser a little bit
|
||
.. autosummary:: | ||
:nosignatures: | ||
:toctree: doc/ | ||
|
||
tensor_dtype.get_np_dtype | ||
utils.tensor_dtype.get_np_dtype |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure where to document these, or whitelisting them, so leave this for @sven1977 to help with, thankks
The reason we document these are because they are PublicAPIs
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Makes sense. Let's leave this here as-is. We'll later retract these (old API stack) APIs' PublicAPI status and then also remove these form the docs again, but for now this is fine.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM. Thanks @can-anyscale .
Signed-off-by: can <can@anyscale.com>
…roject#47114) Add the rest of missing API references for rllib. We can also now enable the API policy lint checker for rllib, now that all missing references are documented Test: - CI <img width="1351" alt="Screenshot 2024-08-13 at 12 15 08 PM" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/cc1d1c8e-763e-4d2e-a7d1-28243a7fdbab"> Signed-off-by: can <can@anyscale.com>
Add the rest of missing API references for rllib. We can also now enable the API policy lint checker for rllib, now that all missing references are documented
Test: