Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[autoscaler] Lint code that we forgot to lint in #4537 #4584

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Apr 10, 2019

Conversation

hartikainen
Copy link
Contributor

I merged #4537 without linting. This fixes the lint errors.

@hartikainen hartikainen requested a review from guoyuhong April 9, 2019 04:34
@hartikainen hartikainen changed the title Lint code that we forgot to lint in previous PR [autoscaler] Lint code that we forgot to lint in #4537 Apr 9, 2019
@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

@jovany-wang
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @hartikainen, is the following case failure produced by #4537 ?

python/ray/tests/test_autoscaler.py::AutoscalingTest::testReportsConfigFailures FAILED [ 30%]

This is the CI result I met: https://travis-ci.com/ray-project/ray/jobs/191124885

@guoyuhong
Copy link
Contributor

@jovany-wang @hartikainen Yes, it looks like python/ray/tests/test_autoscaler.py::AutoscalingTest::testReportsConfigFailure has reproducible failure. Please also fix that. You can ignore the failure of python/ray/tests/test_stress.py::test_submitting_many_actors_to_one.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/Ray-PRB/13648/
Test FAILed.

@hartikainen hartikainen force-pushed the post-merge-formatting branch from f4cc9fe to cc4e42f Compare April 9, 2019 16:40
@hartikainen
Copy link
Contributor Author

hartikainen commented Apr 9, 2019

55e1cdb should fix the test error as well. The problem was that the way we setup some of the autoscaler tests, the setup command merge was not called, and thus some of the commands were not run. I reverted the changes related to the setup command merge. @richardliaw do you mind taking a look (55e1cdb)?

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/Ray-PRB/13664/
Test FAILed.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/Ray-PRB/13663/
Test FAILed.

@hartikainen
Copy link
Contributor Author

jenkins retest this please

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/Ray-PRB/13668/
Test FAILed.

Copy link
Contributor

@guoyuhong guoyuhong left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. I restarted the failed Travis tests. I will merge this PR once the tests finish.

@hartikainen
Copy link
Contributor Author

@guoyuhong Don't merge this yet. I think there's still something off with my latest setup_commands change. I'll fix it tomorrow morning.

@guoyuhong guoyuhong self-requested a review April 10, 2019 05:56
@hartikainen
Copy link
Contributor Author

I just pushed a fix for this. Tested on GCP and everything looks good.

@guoyuhong
Copy link
Contributor

@hartikainen That is to say I can merge this PR if the test passed, right?

@hartikainen
Copy link
Contributor Author

@guoyuhong Yep!

@guoyuhong
Copy link
Contributor

@hartikainen OK, I will keep an eye on it. This PR is better to get merged as soon as possible to unblock other PRs.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/Ray-PRB/13684/
Test FAILed.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/Ray-PRB/13685/
Test FAILed.

Copy link
Contributor

@guoyuhong guoyuhong left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks good. I will merge it.

@guoyuhong guoyuhong merged commit ed02bf1 into ray-project:master Apr 10, 2019
@hartikainen hartikainen deleted the post-merge-formatting branch April 10, 2019 17:02
@ericl
Copy link
Contributor

ericl commented Apr 10, 2019

Ah, thanks for fixing. Next time, we can merge hotfixes such as this immediately.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants