-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 565
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add copy_X
parameter to LinearRegression
#5495
Merged
rapids-bot
merged 14 commits into
rapidsai:branch-23.08
from
viclafargue:lr-copy-x-param
Jul 31, 2023
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
14 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
ee3668a
Add copy_X parameter to LinearRegression
viclafargue 268ad84
addressed review
viclafargue e788d4a
adding pytest
viclafargue 8227eb7
Use hypothesis for unit test.
csadorf 9f19d73
Merge branch 'branch-23.08' into lr-copy-x-param
csadorf ab731a3
Test all algorithms.
csadorf 02d2746
Improve unit test.
csadorf 84ebf4a
Only create deepcopy when necessary.
csadorf 05cad58
Revise the API documentation.
csadorf 7c1a9d2
Merge branch 'branch-23.08' into lr-copy-x-param
csadorf 0e75977
Merge branch 'branch-23.08' into lr-copy-x-param
csadorf 5875b37
Fixup explicit-copy condition check.
csadorf 7a7ffc2
Add note and warning about change in behavior.
csadorf 05dff99
Explicitly test copy_X=None and no argument case.
csadorf File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does the issue only appear when the input is a vector?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Only when this condition is False do we not already create a copy. So checking this ensures that we only create an explicit copy when copy_X is True and none of the other conditions are met which would have triggered a copy anyways.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think I responded to a previous version of your question. Yes, an implicit copy is always created when the input is not a vector.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Would it not make more sense to have this logic be part of the
input_to_cuml_array
utility function?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In principle yes, but that would potentially change the behavior of many more classes and would require more thorough investigation and testing.