Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Windows services editor option #207

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 20, 2016
Merged

Windows services editor option #207

merged 2 commits into from
Jan 20, 2016

Conversation

kprzerwa-r7
Copy link
Contributor

Small addition needed for release 6.1.7 planned for 20160120

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
module Nexpose
# The latest version of the Nexpose gem
VERSION = '3.1.0'
VERSION = '3.1.1'
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This would actually bump to version 3.2.0 since it's a backwards-compatible addition.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, let's not actually include the version file in a pull request. We'll bump the version when we release the next version of the gem.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Understood. Reverted to 3.1.0

@kprzerwa-r7 kprzerwa-r7 force-pushed the enable_windows_services branch from 59ae2d9 to 46a1d85 Compare January 15, 2016 12:18
@kprzerwa-r7 kprzerwa-r7 force-pushed the enable_windows_services branch from 46a1d85 to 2680c8b Compare January 15, 2016 12:36
@kprzerwa-r7
Copy link
Contributor Author

OK to merge and release?

sgreen-r7 added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 20, 2016
@sgreen-r7 sgreen-r7 merged commit c978af0 into master Jan 20, 2016
@sgreen-r7 sgreen-r7 deleted the enable_windows_services branch January 20, 2016 19:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants