Skip to content

Conversation

@turkalpmd
Copy link
Contributor

…/333)

I never thought we would be delayed by almost 5–6 months. I had to adapt to a new country — I’m sorry.

#333 (comment)

@turkalpmd turkalpmd force-pushed the turkalpmd branch 2 times, most recently from 9623c21 to 21e8dc6 Compare April 7, 2025 03:03
@turkalpmd
Copy link
Contributor Author

I cant fix this error. I cant understand, because it is already succesfully passed in my local.

@raphaelvallat raphaelvallat changed the title #333 Look PR comments (https://github.com/raphaelvallat/pingouin/pull… Use robust descriptive stats for non-parametric arrays; Add ransacking post hoc analysis Apr 9, 2025
@raphaelvallat
Copy link
Owner

@turkalpmd can you please limit the scope of this PR to the improvements of the non-parametric pairwise T-tests, and remove the Ransacking post-hoc analysis (which should be implemented in a separate PR)? Thanks

@turkalpmd
Copy link
Contributor Author

As you suggested, I’ve now created separate PRs for each branch.
Here is the Ransacking method: #465
I think this is clearly passed to everything. Now we should fix this PR, I can't understand why I couldn't pass this.

@raphaelvallat raphaelvallat changed the title Use robust descriptive stats for non-parametric arrays; Add ransacking post hoc analysis Use robust descriptive stats for non-parametric arrays Jan 6, 2026
@raphaelvallat raphaelvallat linked an issue Jan 6, 2026 that may be closed by this pull request
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

description in pg.pairwise_tests for non-parametrics

2 participants