Skip to content

Loss Function - Not the PCF? #56

@JonStevensWork

Description

@JonStevensWork

Hello, when looking at the likelihood function for the Weibull, I derived a different function than you do. Here is your function:

loglikelihoods = censored * (K.log(shape) + shape * K.log(x)) - K.pow(x, shape)

However when I do this, I end up with a K.log(scale) term as well. Can you explain how you arrived at your loglikelihood function? I can provide my working if necessary

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions