Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Transpose and PermutedDimsArray the easy way #12

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 14, 2019
Merged

Transpose and PermutedDimsArray the easy way #12

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 14, 2019

Conversation

rafaqz
Copy link
Owner

@rafaqz rafaqz commented Oct 13, 2019

Add constructors for Transpose and PermutedDimsArray that simply wrap them in the dimensional array type and reorder the dims as with permutedims etc.

Should probably also add Adjoint for 1.2+

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Oct 13, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #12 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master      #12   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   65.63%   65.63%           
=======================================
  Files          10       10           
  Lines         291      291           
=======================================
  Hits          191      191           
  Misses        100      100
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/DimensionalData.jl 100% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
src/methods.jl 82.92% <100%> (ø) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update f9eeb37...08d96e0. Read the comment docs.

@rafaqz rafaqz changed the title Transpose and PermuteDimsArray the easy way Transpose and PermutedDimsArray the easy way Oct 13, 2019
@rafaqz rafaqz merged commit 789b5f8 into master Oct 14, 2019
@rafaqz rafaqz deleted the wrapped branch November 26, 2019 19:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants