Skip to content

Conversation

@g-charan
Copy link
Contributor

@g-charan g-charan commented Dec 30, 2024

Solved type errors and a bug regarding hiding the content. Also added tests

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor

    • Updated AccordionContent and AccordionTrigger components to make certain properties optional
    • Simplified rendering logic for accordion content visibility
  • Tests

    • Added comprehensive test suite for Accordion component
    • Implemented tests for rendering, content display, and keyboard navigation

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 30, 2024

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces modifications to the Accordion component's implementation, focusing on making certain props optional in AccordionContent.tsx and AccordionTrigger.tsx. The changes simplify the component's prop requirements and update its rendering logic. A comprehensive test suite for the Accordion component has been added to Accordion.test.tsx, covering rendering, content visibility, and keyboard navigation scenarios.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/components/ui/Accordion/fragments/AccordionContent.tsx - Made index and activeIndex props optional
- Updated rendering logic to conditionally render content based on itemValue and activeItem
src/components/ui/Accordion/fragments/AccordionTrigger.tsx - Made index, activeIndex, and handleClick props optional
- Reorganized import statements
src/components/ui/Accordion/tests/Accordion.test.tsx - Added comprehensive test suite for Accordion component
- Covered rendering, content display, and keyboard interaction tests

Possibly related issues

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

automerge

Suggested reviewers

  • kotAPI

Poem

🐰 Hop, hop, accordion of code,
Props now dance, no longer stowed
Tests spring forth with playful might
Rendering logic, now so light!
A rabbit's code, both free and bright 🎵


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/components/ui/Accordion/fragments/AccordionContent.tsx (1)

19-19: Refactor the ternary expression handling.
The one-liner ternary might trigger linter warnings (e.g., multiline-ternary/operator-linebreak). For improved readability and style, consider refactoring to an early return or a more structured multiline ternary.

Example fix:

-return (
-  itemValue !== activeItem ? null :
-  <div ...>
-    ...
-  </div>
-);
+if (itemValue !== activeItem) {
+  return null;
+}
+
+return (
+  <div ...>
+    ...
+  </div>
+);
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint

[error] 19-19: Expected newline between test and consequent of ternary expression.

(multiline-ternary)


[error] 19-19: ':' should be placed at the beginning of the line.

(operator-linebreak)

src/components/ui/Accordion/tests/Accordion.test.tsx (1)

8-8: Remove trailing comma in array declaration.
Per the lint warning, remove the trailing comma at line 8.

-    { title: 'Item 3', content: <div>Content 3</div> },
+    { title: 'Item 3', content: <div>Content 3</div> }
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint

[error] 8-8: Unexpected trailing comma.

(comma-dangle)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3f61bd1 and ccd2695.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • src/components/ui/Accordion/fragments/AccordionContent.tsx (2 hunks)
  • src/components/ui/Accordion/fragments/AccordionTrigger.tsx (1 hunks)
  • src/components/ui/Accordion/tests/Accordion.test.tsx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 eslint
src/components/ui/Accordion/fragments/AccordionContent.tsx

[error] 19-19: Expected newline between test and consequent of ternary expression.

(multiline-ternary)


[error] 19-19: ':' should be placed at the beginning of the line.

(operator-linebreak)

src/components/ui/Accordion/tests/Accordion.test.tsx

[error] 8-8: Unexpected trailing comma.

(comma-dangle)

🪛 GitHub Check: lint
src/components/ui/Accordion/tests/Accordion.test.tsx

[warning] 3-3:
'AccordionProps' is defined but never used

🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/components/ui/Accordion/fragments/AccordionContent.tsx (1)

8-9: Optional props for index and activeIndex look good.
Marking these props as optional is beneficial for flexibility, but ensure all references to these props handle undefined values gracefully.

src/components/ui/Accordion/fragments/AccordionTrigger.tsx (1)

9-11: Optional prop definitions align with AccordionContent changes.
Making these props optional provides flexibility. Confirm that any logic relying on them safely handles undefined.

src/components/ui/Accordion/tests/Accordion.test.tsx (1)

3-3: AccordionProps is actually in use.
The static analysis hint that AccordionProps is unused appears to be a false positive since it is used to define defaultItems as AccordionProps['items']. This can be safely ignored.

🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: lint

[warning] 3-3:
'AccordionProps' is defined but never used

@kotAPI kotAPI added the automerge A tag that tells kodiak bot to automerge PRs for us when tests and approval conditions are met label Dec 30, 2024
@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot merged commit c86aad5 into rad-ui:main Dec 30, 2024
5 checks passed
@g-charan g-charan deleted the missing-tests-accordion branch January 1, 2025 11:55
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Jul 10, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

automerge A tag that tells kodiak bot to automerge PRs for us when tests and approval conditions are met

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants