-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 53
Added tests for Accordion component #700 #708
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces modifications to the Accordion component's implementation, focusing on making certain props optional in Changes
Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/components/ui/Accordion/fragments/AccordionContent.tsx (1)
19-19: Refactor the ternary expression handling.
The one-liner ternary might trigger linter warnings (e.g., multiline-ternary/operator-linebreak). For improved readability and style, consider refactoring to an early return or a more structured multiline ternary.Example fix:
-return ( - itemValue !== activeItem ? null : - <div ...> - ... - </div> -); +if (itemValue !== activeItem) { + return null; +} + +return ( + <div ...> + ... + </div> +);🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 19-19: Expected newline between test and consequent of ternary expression.
(multiline-ternary)
[error] 19-19: ':' should be placed at the beginning of the line.
(operator-linebreak)
src/components/ui/Accordion/tests/Accordion.test.tsx (1)
8-8: Remove trailing comma in array declaration.
Per the lint warning, remove the trailing comma at line 8.- { title: 'Item 3', content: <div>Content 3</div> }, + { title: 'Item 3', content: <div>Content 3</div> }🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 8-8: Unexpected trailing comma.
(comma-dangle)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
src/components/ui/Accordion/fragments/AccordionContent.tsx(2 hunks)src/components/ui/Accordion/fragments/AccordionTrigger.tsx(1 hunks)src/components/ui/Accordion/tests/Accordion.test.tsx(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 eslint
src/components/ui/Accordion/fragments/AccordionContent.tsx
[error] 19-19: Expected newline between test and consequent of ternary expression.
(multiline-ternary)
[error] 19-19: ':' should be placed at the beginning of the line.
(operator-linebreak)
src/components/ui/Accordion/tests/Accordion.test.tsx
[error] 8-8: Unexpected trailing comma.
(comma-dangle)
🪛 GitHub Check: lint
src/components/ui/Accordion/tests/Accordion.test.tsx
[warning] 3-3:
'AccordionProps' is defined but never used
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/components/ui/Accordion/fragments/AccordionContent.tsx (1)
8-9: Optional props for index and activeIndex look good.
Marking these props as optional is beneficial for flexibility, but ensure all references to these props handle undefined values gracefully.
src/components/ui/Accordion/fragments/AccordionTrigger.tsx (1)
9-11: Optional prop definitions align with AccordionContent changes.
Making these props optional provides flexibility. Confirm that any logic relying on them safely handles undefined.
src/components/ui/Accordion/tests/Accordion.test.tsx (1)
3-3: AccordionProps is actually in use.
The static analysis hint that AccordionProps is unused appears to be a false positive since it is used to define defaultItems as AccordionProps['items']. This can be safely ignored.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: lint
[warning] 3-3:
'AccordionProps' is defined but never used
Solved type errors and a bug regarding hiding the content. Also added tests
Summary by CodeRabbit
Refactor
AccordionContentandAccordionTriggercomponents to make certain properties optionalTests