[Testing]Code block replacement #515
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve modifications to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
docs/app/docs/first-steps/installation/page.js (1)
28-28: Fix prop spacing for consistency.Remove the extra space after the equals sign in the
defClassprop for better code style consistency.-<Copy defClass= {"flex items-center"}> +<Copy defClass={"flex items-center"}>Also applies to: 32-32
docs/components/layout/Documentation/helpers/CodeBlock.js (1)
Line range hint
13-25: Remove duplicate renderElement function definition.The
renderElementfunction is defined twice with identical implementation - once at the module level and once inside theCodeBlockcomponent. This violates the DRY principle and makes maintenance harder.Remove the duplicate definition by using the module-level function:
const CodeBlock = ({ children, language="jsx" }) => { let code = refractor.highlight(children, language); - const renderElement = (element) => { - if (element.type === 'element') { - const { tagName, properties, children } = element; - const className = properties.className.join(' '); - - return React.createElement( - tagName, - { className }, - children.map(renderElement) - ); - } else if (element.type === 'text') { - return element.value; - } else { - return null; - } - }; code = code.children.map(renderElement); // ... };Also applies to: 32-44
docs/components/Copy.js (3)
Line range hint
33-39: Improve styling consistency and maintainability.The button styling mixes Tailwind utilities with inline styles, and uses hardcoded colors. Consider:
- Using only Tailwind utilities for consistency
- Moving to CSS variables for theme-aware colors
- Extracting button styles to a reusable class
<span className={defClass}> {children} <button onClick={handleCopy} - className=" m-0.5 mr-0 ml-2 px-1.5 py-1.5 border border-blue-500 text-sm font-bold rounded text-blue ;" + className="m-0.5 mr-0 ml-2 px-1.5 py-1.5 border border-primary rounded text-sm font-bold text-primary hover:bg-primary/10 transition-colors" > {isCopied ? <TickIcon /> : <CopyIcon />} </button>
Line range hint
8-12: Add error handling for clipboard operations.The clipboard operation could fail in certain browsers or contexts. Consider adding error handling:
const handleCopy = () => { - navigator.clipboard.writeText(children) - setIsCopied(true) + navigator.clipboard.writeText(children) + .then(() => { + setIsCopied(true); + }) + .catch((error) => { + console.error('Failed to copy:', error); + // Optionally show user feedback + }); }
Line range hint
24-31: Extract SVG components for better maintainability.The
TickIconandCopyIconcomponents should be extracted to separate files to improve code organization and reusability.Consider moving these to a separate
iconsdirectory:+// icons/TickIcon.js +export const TickIcon = () => ( + <svg>...</svg> +); + +// icons/CopyIcon.js +export const CopyIcon = () => ( + <svg>...</svg> +);
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
docs/app/docs/first-steps/installation/page.js(1 hunks)docs/components/Copy.js(2 hunks)docs/components/layout/Documentation/helpers/CodeBlock.js(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
docs/app/docs/first-steps/installation/page.js (1)
28-28: Verify component integration.
The changes look good, replacing the code blocks with the new Code component and adding flexbox layout through defClass. Let's verify the integration of these components.
Also applies to: 32-32
✅ Verification successful
Component integration verified successfully
The Copy component is properly implemented in docs/components/Copy.js with support for the defClass prop, which is correctly used to apply the flexbox layout. The component is being used consistently across the installation instructions. No issues found with the integration.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the Code and Copy component integration
# Test 1: Verify Code component import path exists
echo "Verifying Code component path..."
rg -l "@radui/ui/Code"
# Test 2: Check Copy component implementation for defClass prop
echo "Checking Copy component implementation..."
rg -A 5 "export.*Copy" "components/Copy"
# Test 3: Look for other instances that might need similar updates
echo "Checking for other code block usage patterns..."
rg -l "<code[^>]*>" --type js
Length of output: 764
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the Copy component location and implementation
# Search for Copy component in the docs directory
echo "Searching for Copy component..."
fd -e js -e jsx -e tsx "Copy" docs
# Check the implementation of Copy component
echo "Checking Copy component implementation..."
rg -A 10 "export.*Copy" docs
# Check if @radui/ui package is properly configured
echo "Checking package.json for @radui/ui..."
cat package.json | grep -A 5 -B 5 "@radui/ui"
# Look for actual usage of Copy component
echo "Looking for Copy component usage..."
rg "<Copy.*>" docs
Length of output: 2283
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the Copy component implementation for defClass prop support
# Check the full implementation of Copy component
echo "Checking Copy component full implementation..."
cat docs/components/Copy.js
# Check if there are any prop type definitions or interfaces for Copy
echo "Checking for prop types..."
rg -A 5 "interface.*Props|PropTypes" docs/components/Copy.js
# Check other instances of defClass usage
echo "Checking other defClass usages..."
rg "defClass" docs
Length of output: 3096
docs/components/layout/Documentation/helpers/CodeBlock.js (1)
5-6: LGTM: New imports are correctly added.
The imports for Copy and Code components align with the PR objectives.
docs/components/Copy.js (1)
Line range hint 14-21: LGTM: Proper cleanup in useEffect.
The useEffect cleanup is well implemented, properly clearing the timeout to prevent memory leaks.
| <Text className="mt-4 mb-1 font-medium">Using npm</Text> | ||
| <Code> | ||
| <Copy>npm install @radui/ui --save</Copy> | ||
| <Copy defClass= {"flex items-center"}>npm install @radui/ui --save</Copy> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
remove the classes from here, declare it inside the component, we don't need to repeat ourselves
|
|
||
|
|
||
| function Copy({ children }) { | ||
| function Copy({ children, defClass }) { |
|
|
||
| return( | ||
| <span className = "flex items-center"> | ||
| <span className={defClass}> |
|
Let's close this and re-do again soon |
2 participants
Replaced the 'code' block in return with 'Code' imported from "@radui/ui/Code" to test and integrate one component usage only.
Copy at "@/components/Copy" now has prop for styling "defClass"
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Copycomponent to allow dynamic styling through a newdefClassprop.CodeBlockcomponent to utilize the newCopyandCodecomponents for improved code display.Bug Fixes
Documentation
Introductioncomponent for better clarity.