Added text component #452
Added text component #452
Conversation
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThis pull request introduces several changes across multiple files. A new JavaScript file, Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
impirios
force-pushed
the
yogesh/text-component
branch
from
b33bdac to
6973dd9
Compare
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
docs/app/docs/components/text/docs/codeUsage.js (2)
3-10: Consider renaming the example componentThe JavaScript example effectively demonstrates how to import and use the
Textcomponent. However, the component nameHeadingExamplesmight be misleading as it's using a generalTextcomponent, not specifically a heading.Consider renaming it to something more generic like
TextExampleorTextUsageExampleto better reflect its content.
11-19: Remove unnecessary empty lines in CSSThe CSS styles for
.rad-ui-textare clear and appropriate. However, there are two unnecessary empty lines at the end of the CSS code (lines 16-17). These should be removed to keep the code clean and concise.Apply this diff to remove the empty lines:
.rad-ui-text{ font-size: 16px; line-height: 24px; } - -docs/app/docs/components/text/page.js (2)
10-23: Component structure looks goodThe overall structure of the TextDocs component is well-organized and appropriate for a documentation page. The use of the Documentation component with relevant props is correct.
Consider simplifying the description prop by removing the template literal syntax since it's a single-line string:
- <Documentation currentPage={PAGE_NAME} title='Text' description={` - Text is used to display customizable text content. - `}> + <Documentation currentPage={PAGE_NAME} title='Text' description="Text is used to display customizable text content.">This change makes the code more concise without affecting functionality.
15-19: Use meaningful example textWhile the structure and usage of the Documentation.ComponentHero component are correct, consider using more meaningful example text for the Text component instead of "Lorem ipsum".
Replace the placeholder text with something that demonstrates the purpose of the Text component:
- <Text>Lorem ipsum</Text> + <Text>This is an example of the Text component</Text>This change will make the documentation more informative and immediately show the purpose of the Text component to users.
docs/components/navigation/Navigation.js (1)
Line range hint
94-108: Consider cleaning up commented-out componentsThere are several commented-out component entries in the navigation array. While these may represent future work, keeping them in the production code might lead to confusion or maintenance issues.
Consider one of the following approaches:
- Remove the commented-out components if they are not needed.
- If these components are planned for future implementation, consider moving them to a separate "Upcoming Components" section in the navigation or to a separate planning document.
- Add a comment explaining why these components are commented out and when they are expected to be implemented.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- docs/app/docs/components/text/docs/codeUsage.js (1 hunks)
- docs/app/docs/components/text/page.js (1 hunks)
- docs/components/navigation/Navigation.js (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
docs/app/docs/components/text/docs/codeUsage.js (2)
1-2: LGTM: Well-structured code objectThe
codeobject is well-structured with clear properties for JavaScript and CSS examples. The use of a constant and default export is appropriate for this use case.Also applies to: 20-22
1-22: Overall assessment: Good example file with minor improvements suggestedThis new file effectively demonstrates the usage of the Text component with both JavaScript and CSS examples. The structure is clear and the examples are concise.
A few minor improvements were suggested:
- Renaming the example component to better reflect its content.
- Removing unnecessary empty lines in the CSS code.
These changes will enhance the clarity and consistency of the documentation. Great job on providing this useful example for the Text component!
docs/app/docs/components/text/page.js (1)
25-25: Default export looks goodThe default export of the TextDocs component is correct and follows common React patterns.
docs/components/navigation/Navigation.js (2)
80-83: New "Text" component added to navigationThe addition of the "Text" component to the navigation aligns with the PR title "Added text component". This change appears to be correct and consistent with the PR's objective.
Line range hint
1-184: Approval: Well-structured Navigation componentThe overall implementation of the Navigation component is well-structured and follows React and Next.js best practices:
- Proper use of the "use client" directive for Client Components in Next.js.
- Effective use of the
usePathnamehook to highlight the current page.- Clear and maintainable component structure.
Good job on maintaining a clean and efficient implementation!
| const PAGE_NAME = 'BADGE_DOCS' | ||
| import Documentation from "@/components/layout/Documentation/Documentation" | ||
|
|
||
| import Text from '@radui/ui/Text' | ||
| import SEO from "../../docsIndex" | ||
| export const metadata = SEO.getMetadata(PAGE_NAME) | ||
|
|
||
| import codeUsage from "./docs/codeUsage" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Multiple Components Have Incorrect PAGE_NAME Values
The PAGE_NAME constant is set to 'BADGE_DOCS' in multiple component documentation pages (badge, text, separator, code, button, heading, blockquote, em). This likely results from a copy-paste error and can cause incorrect SEO metadata and navigation issues.
Please update each PAGE_NAME to reflect the correct component, for example:
-const PAGE_NAME = 'BADGE_DOCS'
+const PAGE_NAME = 'TEXT_DOCS'Ensure that each documentation page uses the appropriate PAGE_NAME value corresponding to its component.
🔗 Analysis chain
Correct the PAGE_NAME constant value
The PAGE_NAME constant is set to 'BADGE_DOCS', but this file is about the Text component. This inconsistency could lead to confusion and potential errors in SEO metadata and navigation.
Please update the constant to reflect the correct component:
-const PAGE_NAME = 'BADGE_DOCS'
+const PAGE_NAME = 'TEXT_DOCS'Also, verify that this change doesn't break any existing navigation or metadata retrieval logic in your documentation system.
To ensure this change doesn't affect other parts of the codebase, run the following script:
If this search returns results, those occurrences might need to be updated as well.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for other occurrences of 'BADGE_DOCS' in the codebase
# Test: Search for 'BADGE_DOCS' in all files
rg --type-add 'web:*.{js,jsx,ts,tsx}' --type web 'BADGE_DOCS'
Length of output: 628
| { | ||
| title: "Text", | ||
| path: "/docs/components/text" | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Inconsistent use of is_new flag
Several components (Kbd, Progress, Toggle, and ToggleGroup) have been marked as is_new: true, while the newly added "Text" component doesn't have this flag. This inconsistency might lead to confusion about which components are actually new.
Consider one of the following approaches:
- Add the
is_new: trueflag to the "Text" component if it's indeed new. - Remove the
is_new: trueflag from components that aren't new in this PR. - If these flags are managed automatically, verify the logic for setting the
is_newproperty.
Also applies to: 84-88, 89-93, 94-98, 99-103, 104-108
| @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@ | |||
| const PAGE_NAME = 'BADGE_DOCS' | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
TEXT_DOCS
- we use this as an identifier to render correct SEO details for indexing
| javascript: { | ||
| code: `import Text from "@radui/ui/Text" | ||
| const HeadingExamples = () => ( |
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| title: "Text", | ||
| path: "/docs/components/text" |
Head branch was pushed to by a user without write access
2 participants
Fixes #447
Summary by CodeRabbit
codeUsage.jsfile.