-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 73
Description
Preamble
The {testthat}
tests read like sentences (à la BDD), and when the description is in the same line as the function name, this can really boost its readability. For example, the following:
test_that("multiplication works", {
expect_equal(2 * 2, 4)
})
can be read mentally as
"test that multiplication works as expected"
and the formatting helps this mental dialogue.
Actual vs Expected
But when the code is styled differently (e.g. using Allman-style indentation),
library(styler)
'test_that(
"multiplication works",
{
expect_equal(2 * 2, 4)
}
)' -> code
style_text(code)
#> test_that(
#> "multiplication works",
#> {
#> expect_equal(2 * 2, 4)
#> }
#> )
{styler}
doesn't restyle it to its more readable version:
#> test_that("multiplication works", {
#> expect_equal(2 * 2, 4)
#> })
Do you think {styler}
should by default restyle such calls? Or doing so violates its "non-invasive" nature?
FWIW, the style guide doesn't seem to have anything to say in this matter (except indirectly).
Exception
This is feature request is relevant only when there are no keyword arguments, only positional arguments, are present in the test_that()
call.
'test_that(
desc = "multiplication works",
code = {
expect_equal(2 * 2, 4)
}
)' -> code
style_text(code)
#> test_that(
#> desc = "multiplication works",
#> code = {
#> expect_equal(2 * 2, 4)
#> }
#> )