-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 108
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Web-browser integration #341
Comments
matrix-org/matrix-spec-proposals#455 is the issue about the scheme, ftr. |
@KitsuneRal I would be really happy to participate in a scheme proposal, even if unofficial to move things forward. I would integrate it into the various Kamax products - so you have my support for option 1 if we can debate it a little bit like we did for .well-known |
Reactions and edited messages support
The URI scheme is there, what remains is making Quaternion understand and dispatch (via some single-application-window framework) URIs passed as arguments. |
See also #213. |
There's a growing case for Quaternion to take a link or a shortcut from the browser and open it. While we still don't have the Matrix protocol scheme officially coined, possible options include:
The last option seems the least convenient for users but doesn't need anything from the website authors. The two former options are roughly equal in the level of (in)convenience for website authors and for the audience, it seems.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: