Skip to content

Conversation

@michaelruelas
Copy link
Contributor

Apply gofmt -s to fix formatting warnings reported by Go Report Card:

  • Reorder imports alphabetically in cmd/ files
  • Fix struct field alignment in internal/api/types.go

This brings gofmt compliance from 70% to 100%.

Apply gofmt -s to fix formatting warnings reported by Go Report Card:
- Reorder imports alphabetically in cmd/ files
- Fix struct field alignment in internal/api/types.go

This brings gofmt compliance from 70% to 100%.
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @michaelruelas, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request addresses and resolves formatting warnings identified by Go Report Card, specifically targeting gofmt compliance. The changes ensure that import statements are consistently alphabetized and struct fields are properly aligned, ultimately bringing the project's gofmt compliance from 70% to 100%. This improves code consistency and maintainability.

Highlights

  • Import Reordering: Alphabetized import statements across all cmd/ package files to adhere to gofmt -s standards.
  • Struct Field Alignment: Corrected the alignment of struct fields within internal/api/types.go to improve readability and gofmt compliance.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request correctly applies gofmt to fix formatting issues across several files. The changes, including reordering imports and aligning struct fields, improve code consistency and adhere to standard Go style. The work is clean and achieves its stated goal of improving gofmt compliance. No issues were found in these changes.

@michaelruelas michaelruelas merged commit d9d97dd into main Nov 7, 2025
8 checks passed
@michaelruelas michaelruelas deleted the claude/fix-gofmt-formatting-011CUsudJ8qau26oZ2x9aTZc branch November 7, 2025 04:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants