Skip to content

Conversation

@tomerqodo
Copy link

@tomerqodo tomerqodo commented Jan 29, 2026

Benchmark PR from agentic-review-benchmarks#10

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Implemented caching mechanism for subscription plan data to improve retrieval performance.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved error handling with per-item validation when processing subscription plans; invalid plans are now gracefully skipped with logged exceptions.
    • Enhanced logging for better visibility into success and failure paths.
  • Tests

    • Added integration tests covering cache hits, misses, expiration, and failure scenarios.
    • Added unit tests for invalid plan data handling.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 29, 2026

Walkthrough

Redis-backed caching system added to BillingService for bulk plan fetching with fallback to API calls on cache misses. Per-item error handling enhanced to validate and skip invalid plans. New integration and unit tests cover caching scenarios, TTL behavior, cache failures, and error handling in plan validation.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Caching & Error Handling
api/services/billing_service.py
Added Redis cache layer with configurable TTL for tenant plan data; introduced get_plan_bulk_with_cache method using mget for bulk retrieval and pipeline for batch updates. Strengthened get_plan_bulk with per-item validation inside try/except blocks to handle invalid plans gracefully. Added __str__ method to SubscriptionPlan for debugging.
Integration Tests
api/tests/test_containers_integration_tests/services/test_billing_service.py
Comprehensive integration test suite for cache behavior: full cache hits/misses, partial hits, Redis operation failures, invalid JSON/plan data in cache, empty lists, TTL constraints, and cache expiration scenarios. Uses testcontainers and Redis to validate cache population, fallback mechanisms, and result correctness.
Unit Tests
api/tests/unit_tests/services/test_billing_service.py
New test case verifying that invalid plans (e.g., missing expiration_date) are skipped during bulk fetching, with appropriate exception logging per tenant while preserving valid results.

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant Client
    participant BillingService
    participant Redis
    participant API as Subscription API
    
    Client->>BillingService: get_plan_bulk_with_cache(tenant_ids)
    BillingService->>Redis: mget(cache_keys)
    Redis-->>BillingService: cached_plans (partial/empty)
    
    alt All Cached
        BillingService-->>Client: return cached plans
    else Cache Miss or Partial
        BillingService->>API: get_plan_bulk(missing_ids)
        API-->>BillingService: api_plans (with validation)
        
        BillingService->>Redis: pipeline(setex for each plan)
        Redis-->>BillingService: ack
        
        BillingService-->>Client: return merged(cached + api_plans)
    else Redis Failure
        BillingService->>API: get_plan_bulk(all_ids)
        API-->>BillingService: api_plans
        BillingService-->>Client: return api_plans
    end
Loading

Estimated code review effort

🎯 4 (Complex) | ⏱️ ~45 minutes

Poem

🐰✨ A cache hops in with Redis so fleet,
Plans bundled fast, no retry repeat!
When cache falls short, the API's our friend,
And invalid data? We skip to the end!
Tests guard each path, from miss to expire,
A billing sprint worthy of carrots entire! 🥕

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1
❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Description check ⚠️ Warning The PR description only contains a benchmark PR reference without addressing required template sections like Summary, motivation, context, or dependency information. Add a comprehensive summary explaining the caching implementation, its benefits, and any dependencies. Include relevant motivation and context for the change.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title 'feat: get plan bulk with cache' clearly summarizes the main change: adding a caching mechanism for bulk plan retrieval.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed Docstring coverage is 86.36% which is sufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Fix all issues with AI agents
In `@api/services/billing_service.py`:
- Around line 285-295: The code currently inserts results[tenant_id] = None when
subscription_adapter.validate_python raises; instead, in get_plan_bulk only add
tenant entries to results when validation succeeds (and subscription_plan is not
None). Locate the subscription_adapter.validate_python call inside get_plan_bulk
and remove the fallback assignment results[tenant_id] = None in the inner
except; simply log the exception (logger.exception(...)) and do not modify
results for that tenant so invalid tenants are omitted. Ensure the outer except
still continues on batch fetch failure.
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
api/services/billing_service.py (1)

28-30: Remove the __str__ method from SubscriptionPlan TypedDict; it will never execute.

TypedDict is a static typing construct only. At runtime, TypeAdapter(SubscriptionPlan).validate_python(...) returns a plain dict, not a SubscriptionPlan instance, so the custom __str__ method is dead code. If human-readable logging is needed, use a Pydantic BaseModel, dataclass, or a standalone formatter function instead.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f117f0a and 70fe873.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • api/services/billing_service.py
  • api/tests/test_containers_integration_tests/services/test_billing_service.py
  • api/tests/unit_tests/services/test_billing_service.py
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code graph analysis (3)
api/tests/unit_tests/services/test_billing_service.py (2)
api/tests/unit_tests/extensions/test_ext_request_logging.py (1)
  • mock_logger (60-63)
api/services/billing_service.py (1)
  • get_plan_bulk (267-297)
api/tests/test_containers_integration_tests/services/test_billing_service.py (1)
api/services/billing_service.py (3)
  • BillingService (33-396)
  • _make_plan_cache_key (300-301)
  • get_plan_bulk_with_cache (304-387)
api/services/billing_service.py (3)
api/controllers/console/billing/billing.py (2)
  • get (37-41)
  • get (50-53)
api/libs/helper.py (1)
  • RateLimiter (376-402)
api/extensions/ext_redis.py (1)
  • setex (73-73)
🔇 Additional comments (20)
api/services/billing_service.py (4)

1-1: Import supports cache serialization.

Nice to see JSON is explicitly available for cache payloads.


39-42: Cache key prefix and TTL are explicit.

Clear constants make cache behavior easy to tune.


299-301: Cache key helper looks good.


303-387: Cache-miss fallback and pipeline write-back are solid.

api/tests/unit_tests/services/test_billing_service.py (1)

1297-1331: Good coverage for invalid tenant plan handling.

api/tests/test_containers_integration_tests/services/test_billing_service.py (15)

1-8: Imports match the test needs.


10-21: Class-level scenario coverage is clearly documented.


22-34: Redis cleanup fixture is clear.


35-37: Helper keeps plan data setup concise.


39-43: Cache set helper is straightforward.


45-53: Cache get helper is straightforward.


55-85: Cache-hit scenario is well covered.


86-125: Cache-miss + write-back path is well covered.


126-156: Partial cache-hit behavior is covered.


157-187: Redis mget failure fallback is covered.


188-239: Invalid JSON cache fallback is covered.


240-272: Schema mismatch fallback is covered.


273-301: Pipeline failure resiliency is covered.


302-319: Empty input case is covered.


320-365: TTL expiry behavior is covered.

✏️ Tip: You can disable this entire section by setting review_details to false in your review settings.

Comment on lines +285 to 295
try:
subscription_plan = subscription_adapter.validate_python(plan)
results[tenant_id] = subscription_plan
except Exception:
logger.exception(
"get_plan_bulk: failed to validate subscription plan for tenant(%s)", tenant_id
)
results[tenant_id] = None
except Exception:
logger.exception("Failed to fetch billing info batch for tenants: %s", chunk)
logger.exception("get_plan_bulk: failed to fetch billing info batch for tenants: %s", chunk)
continue
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟠 Major

Skip invalid tenants instead of inserting None.

Inserting None violates the declared return type and conflicts with the new unit test that expects invalid tenants to be omitted.

💡 Suggested fix
                 for tenant_id, plan in data.items():
                     try:
                         subscription_plan = subscription_adapter.validate_python(plan)
                         results[tenant_id] = subscription_plan
                     except Exception:
                         logger.exception(
                             "get_plan_bulk: failed to validate subscription plan for tenant(%s)", tenant_id
                         )
-                        results[tenant_id] = None
+                        # Skip invalid tenant entry
+                        continue
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In `@api/services/billing_service.py` around lines 285 - 295, The code currently
inserts results[tenant_id] = None when subscription_adapter.validate_python
raises; instead, in get_plan_bulk only add tenant entries to results when
validation succeeds (and subscription_plan is not None). Locate the
subscription_adapter.validate_python call inside get_plan_bulk and remove the
fallback assignment results[tenant_id] = None in the inner except; simply log
the exception (logger.exception(...)) and do not modify results for that tenant
so invalid tenants are omitted. Ensure the outer except still continues on batch
fetch failure.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants