Skip to content

Conversation

@antgonza
Copy link
Member

@antgonza antgonza commented Sep 6, 2018

First review/merge: #2658 because I already pulled those changes to avoid future SQL patch conflicts.

See functionality, just testing listing cause download works the same way but takes much longer cause it downloads the files:
ssh-download

Note that I had to add study_id to the list_remote_files method so we could store in redis the results.

ryanusahk and others added 30 commits July 24, 2018 10:59
Strips UTF-8 characters from study titles
UTF-8 characters that are not also printable ASCII characters are stripped
from new study titles, as well as existing studies flagged 'public'. This is
because study titles are passed as metadata to new analyses, and some analysis
packages may not work well with them.
Merging charles-cowart->66.py with another topic branch 66.py
@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Sep 11, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #2662 into dev will decrease coverage by 0.07%.
The diff coverage is 79.34%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##              dev    #2662      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   94.38%   94.31%   -0.08%     
==========================================
  Files         166      166              
  Lines       19563    19653      +90     
==========================================
+ Hits        18465    18536      +71     
- Misses       1098     1117      +19
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
qiita_pet/test/test_upload.py 97.67% <100%> (+4.34%) ⬆️
qiita_pet/webserver.py 100% <100%> (ø) ⬆️
qiita_pet/handlers/upload.py 55.63% <69.84%> (+10.63%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 71c33e7...e658f86. Read the comment docs.

Copy link
Contributor

@charles-cowart charles-cowart left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

66.py contains a magic number on line 24 that could use a comment, but everything else seems to be in order.

@antgonza
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks for review @charles-cowart, what about merging and then I add that comment in the next pr as I need to fix conflicts on that one too ...

@charles-cowart
Copy link
Contributor

charles-cowart commented Sep 11, 2018 via email

@antgonza
Copy link
Member Author

👍

@charles-cowart charles-cowart merged commit 287f703 into qiita-spots:dev Sep 11, 2018
@antgonza antgonza mentioned this pull request Sep 21, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants