Skip to content

Conversation

@josenavas
Copy link
Contributor

It depends on #1529 so review/merge that one first.

Fixes the tests for the study and analysis objects. It also fixes the objects to retrieve instances of other objects rather than just the id.

@ElDeveloper
Copy link
Contributor

@josenavas, when you have a chance can you pull from upstream artifact?

@josenavas
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ElDeveloper you should review/merge #1529 first.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I know you didn't change this but are the black lines necessary? In the past we have use - at the beginning of each paragraph. Obviously, not blocking.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done

@ElDeveloper
Copy link
Contributor

👍 looks good to me!

antgonza added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 17, 2015
@antgonza antgonza merged commit bb6adad into qiita-spots:artifact Nov 17, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants