Skip to content

Conversation

@antgonza
Copy link
Member

As discussed yesterday, this PR is solving some of the standing issues in the PR #1451. This should be easy and quick to review.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Dumb question. What exactly is Element? Is it an xml element corresponding to xml.etree? It would be nice to include the object type in the docs

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I can do that but AFAIK is not standard (however, this is not a standard type). What about xml.etree.ElementTree.Element?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actually, we commonly use pd.DataFrame instead of pandas.DataFrame or np.DataFrame instead of numpy.DataFrame.

So just ET.Element should be good enough.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The reason we use np and pd instead of numpy and pandas is because np and pd are standard abbreviations. Is ET a standard abbreviation of xml.etree.ElementTree?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for checking! In such case, 👍 to ET.Element

@josenavas
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @antgonza, done with the review.

@adamrp
Copy link
Contributor

adamrp commented Sep 10, 2015

👍

josenavas added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 10, 2015
cover some of the issue in the joy list
@josenavas josenavas merged commit 3dafca4 into qiita-spots:ebi-improvements Sep 10, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants