allow per user_level and per_user slurm submission flags

[antgonza]

It would be ideal if we could allow extra or replace flags for slurm job submissions based on the:

• user_level: if the job belongs to group X add/update certain flags or change queue
• per_user: if the job belongs to user Y add/update certain flags or change queue

One of the values we would like to use is:
All_other_users. --nice[=+10000]
Admin_users --nice[=+5000]
Wetlab_users --nice[=0]

[jdereus]

My concern with the proposed, is that the wetlab_users should likely trump all others. It has been repeatedly argued that their jobs need to go first. So if an admin user is running a bunch of jobs, (for what reason?), they will continue to block. Thanks, Jeff D From: Antonio Gonzalez ***@***.***> Reply-To: qiita-spots/qiita ***@***.***> Date: Monday, October 16, 2023 at 1:45 PM To: qiita-spots/qiita ***@***.***> Cc: Subscribed ***@***.***> Subject: [qiita-spots/qiita] allow per user_level and per_user slurm submission flags (Issue #3322) It would be ideal if we could allow extra or replace flags for slurm job submissions based on the: * user_level: if the job belongs to group X add/update certain flags or change queue * per_user: if the job belongs to user Y add/update certain flags or change queue One of the values we would like to use is: All_other_users. --nice[=+10000] Admin_users --nice[=+5000] Wetlab_users --nice[=0] — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/github.com/qiita-spots/qiita/issues/3322__;!!LLK065n_VXAQ!hff6x1sIwvisUCtGD7bluUeM1Rb-KOZUS01Mw3pIAsbVs7SgrWCdxrzw9QbHkAsRnNcjYPkncFMj7-kY8t7Z2f5XXw$>, or unsubscribe<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADNLN3JBHUCOEUVZAW6J3CTX7V6EVAVCNFSM6AAAAAA6CUPP66VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43ASLTON2WKOZRHE2DKOBXGM2DONY__;!!LLK065n_VXAQ!hff6x1sIwvisUCtGD7bluUeM1Rb-KOZUS01Mw3pIAsbVs7SgrWCdxrzw9QbHkAsRnNcjYPkncFMj7-kY8t69ahBbSA$>. You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[antgonza]

Got it; what would be the proposed solution for that scenario?

[jdereus]

I don’t know at this time. Just providing my thoughts on it. I would prefer to not see a solution that still locks jobs out after all the work being put in. Thanks, Jeff D From: Antonio Gonzalez ***@***.***> Reply-To: qiita-spots/qiita ***@***.***> Date: Monday, October 16, 2023 at 1:52 PM To: qiita-spots/qiita ***@***.***> Cc: jdereus ***@***.***>, Comment ***@***.***> Subject: Re: [qiita-spots/qiita] allow per user_level and per_user slurm submission flags (Issue #3322) Got it; what would be the proposed solution for that scenario? — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/github.com/qiita-spots/qiita/issues/3322*issuecomment-1765093259__;Iw!!LLK065n_VXAQ!gpGlXcIHCXWZe0MflR9p8qnB2AE8YlYwLl97iJ3SriWaatOazxp6KsJvdDVutqe-1RREXMHx2YKsh_wF_1rgN9RTiw$>, or unsubscribe<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADNLN3IZNO7NOZAGP23B3FLX7V673AVCNFSM6AAAAAA6CUPP66VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTONRVGA4TGMRVHE__;!!LLK065n_VXAQ!gpGlXcIHCXWZe0MflR9p8qnB2AE8YlYwLl97iJ3SriWaatOazxp6KsJvdDVutqe-1RREXMHx2YKsh_wF_1rQCJOUMQ$>. You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: ***@***.***>