Speeding up rotate_h_with_vqe
#40
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Thanks! Another thing is that we need to often use the vqe unitary cf #34 notebooks for the manipulations that we consider for testing things on the states i.e. exposing the vqe unitary out of |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
rotate_h_with_vqewas slow when dealing with large number of qubits. The bottleneck seems to be related tocircuit.unitary()which computes the unitary transformation implemented by the circuit. To speed up the execution I opted for fusing the circuit before asking for the unitary transformation.I need to test it to check if everything is working correctly but the speed up is already visible.