Use specific safety schema version #618
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes involve updates to the version specifications for the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
setup.cfg (1)
53-53: Document the reason for version pinning.Please ensure the changelog includes the rationale for pinning to this specific version. This helps future maintainers understand why this decision was made.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- setup.cfg (1 hunks)
- test_requirements.txt (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (2)
test_requirements.txt (1)
20-20: Verify compatibility with pre-release version.The
0.x.xversion number indicates pre-release software. Please ensure that version 0.0.5 has been thoroughly tested with your use cases.✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about how safety_schemas is being used in the codebase to better understand its integration and potential impact.
Based on the gathered information, I can now provide a final response as we have sufficient evidence about how safety_schemas is integrated into the codebase.
Pre-release version 0.0.5 appears to be deeply integrated and stable within the codebase
The analysis shows that safety_schemas is a core dependency extensively used throughout the codebase for critical functionality:
- It provides essential data models and schemas used across multiple components (auth, scan, CLI)
- The models are used for core features like vulnerability scanning, project configuration, and policy management
- No critical TODOs or FIXMEs related to safety_schemas compatibility were found
- The integration appears stable with proper type hints and consistent usage patterns
While it is a pre-release version, the extensive integration and lack of schema-related issues in the codebase suggests it's been thoroughly tested in practice. The TODOs found are related to other components and don't indicate any compatibility concerns with safety_schemas.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any compatibility issues or reported bugs with safety_schemas 0.0.5 # Test: Look for potential issues in changelog or release notes rg -i "safety.?schemas.*0\.0\.5" CHANGELOG.md || echo "No changelog entry found" # Test: Check for any TODO/FIXME comments related to safety_schemas rg -i "todo|fixme|hack|xxx|bug.*safety.?schemas"Length of output: 1692
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check how safety_schemas is being used in the codebase rg -l "safety_schemas" # Look for specific imports and usage patterns rg -A 3 "from safety_schemas|import safety_schemas" # Check for any test files related to safety_schemas fd "test.*\.py" --exec grep -l "safety_schemas" {} \; # Look for any configuration or schema files fd "schema.*\.(json|yaml|yml)" --exec grep -l "safety" {} \;Length of output: 7186
setup.cfg (1)
53-53: Verify compatibility with other dependencies.Since safety_schemas is still in early development (0.0.x), let's verify there are no compatibility issues with other packages that might require different versions.
✅ Verification successful
Let me check the content of these files to see the actual version requirements.
Let me check if there are any imports or usage patterns of safety_schemas in the codebase to understand how it's being used.
Let me try again without specifying the file type since Python type is not recognized:
Based on the comprehensive analysis, I can now provide the final response:
The safety_schemas version 0.0.5 is consistently used across the project
The verification shows that:
- Both
setup.cfgandtest_requirements.txtspecify the exact same version (0.0.5)- The package is extensively used throughout the codebase, primarily for importing models and type definitions
- All imports are using the same schema structures, suggesting version compatibility
- There are no conflicting version requirements found in any of the dependency files
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if any other packages in the ecosystem depend on safety_schemas # and what versions they require # Search for safety_schemas as a dependency in setup files echo "Checking setup files for safety_schemas dependencies..." rg -l "safety_schemas" -g "setup.{py,cfg}" # Search for safety_schemas in requirements files echo "Checking requirements files for safety_schemas dependencies..." rg -l "safety_schemas" -g "*requirements*.txt"Length of output: 377
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the actual version requirements in both files echo "Content of safety_schemas requirement in setup.cfg:" rg "safety_schemas" setup.cfg echo -e "\nContent of safety_schemas requirement in test_requirements.txt:" rg "safety_schemas" test_requirements.txtLength of output: 375
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for safety_schemas imports and usage in the codebase echo "Files importing or using safety_schemas:" rg -l "from safety_schemas|import safety_schemas|safety_schemas\." --type python echo -e "\nActual import/usage patterns:" rg "from safety_schemas|import safety_schemas|safety_schemas\." --type python -A 2Length of output: 395
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for safety_schemas imports and usage in the codebase echo "Files importing or using safety_schemas:" rg -l "from safety_schemas|import safety_schemas|safety_schemas\." echo -e "\nActual import/usage patterns:" rg "from safety_schemas|import safety_schemas|safety_schemas\." -A 2Length of output: 6170
| @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ Authlib>=1.2.0 | |||
| rich | |||
| typer | |||
| pydantic>=1.10.12 | |||
| safety_schemas>=0.0.4 | |||
| safety_schemas==0.0.5 | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider the trade-offs of strict version pinning.
While pinning to ==0.0.5 ensures reproducible environments, it might cause you to miss important updates. Consider using ~=0.0.5 (compatible release) to automatically accept patch updates while maintaining stability.
-safety_schemas==0.0.5
+safety_schemas~=0.0.5📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| safety_schemas==0.0.5 | |
| safety_schemas~=0.0.5 |
| @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ install_requires = | |||
| rich | |||
| typer | |||
| pydantic>=1.10.12 | |||
| safety_schemas>=0.0.4 | |||
| safety_schemas==0.0.5 | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider using ~= instead of == for version constraint.
While pinning to an exact version ensures stability, using ~=0.0.5 would allow patch updates while preventing minor version changes. This provides a balance between stability and security updates.
- safety_schemas==0.0.5
+ safety_schemas~=0.0.5📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| safety_schemas==0.0.5 | |
| safety_schemas~=0.0.5 |
|
@jakub-safetycli I've added @yeisonvargasf as a reviewer here. It is a simple change but I want to be sure there are no unintended consequences for this! |
|
I am not certain we want to pin to a specific version of safety-schemas |
|
The reason to do that is to have more control over when exactly the change in the CLI will be applied. Today any new releases of that package can be immediately pick up with new CLI installs and that can lead to unexpected errors. If we have control which version is used by CLI we can make more controlled rollout of the features. |
Description
Pins the safety_schemas to specific version to improve on stability of the introduced changes.
Type of Change
Related Issues
Testing
Checklist
Additional Notes
Summary by CodeRabbit
safety_schemasdependency to a specific version0.0.5in configuration files for improved stability and consistency.