Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix DistributedModelParallel links in torchrec_intro_tutorial #3235

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

guspan-tanadi
Copy link
Contributor

@guspan-tanadi guspan-tanadi commented Jan 19, 2025

Fixes #

Description

Checklist

  • The issue that is being fixed is referred in the description
  • Only one issue is addressed in this pull request
  • Labels from the issue that this PR is fixing are added to this pull request
  • No unnecessary issues are included into this pull request.

cc @svekars @sekyondaMeta @AlannaBurke

Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Jan 19, 2025

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/tutorials/3235

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ No Failures

As of commit 0ab3667 with merge base 15ef015 (image):
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@svekars
Copy link
Contributor

svekars commented Jan 21, 2025

@guspan-tanadi thank you for the PR - I was wondering if you can fix other links too? See: https://github.com/pytorch/tutorials/actions/runs/12855061734/job/35937409459?pr=3235

@svekars svekars added the skip-link-check Will allow you to skip linkcheck on a PR. Should only should be used when a link can't be fixed. label Jan 28, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cla signed incorrect link skip-link-check Will allow you to skip linkcheck on a PR. Should only should be used when a link can't be fixed.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants