Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixing timing scheme in cpp_extension tutorial #1851

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 9, 2022

Conversation

stevenwalton
Copy link
Contributor

Print statement incorrectly stated us when it was in 100ms units.
For clarity I changed it to s units and removed the multiplication.
This could have intended to be averaged but total time works just as
well.

Print statement incorrectly stated `us` when it was in `100ms` units.
For clarity I changed it to `s` units and removed the multiplication.
This could have intended to be averaged but total time works just as
well.
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @stevenwalton!

Thank you for your pull request and welcome to our community.

Action Required

In order to merge any pull request (code, docs, etc.), we require contributors to sign our Contributor License Agreement, and we don't seem to have one on file for you.

Process

In order for us to review and merge your suggested changes, please sign at https://code.facebook.com/cla. If you are contributing on behalf of someone else (eg your employer), the individual CLA may not be sufficient and your employer may need to sign the corporate CLA.

Once the CLA is signed, our tooling will perform checks and validations. Afterwards, the pull request will be tagged with CLA signed. The tagging process may take up to 1 hour after signing. Please give it that time before contacting us about it.

If you have received this in error or have any questions, please contact us at cla@fb.com. Thanks!

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Mar 9, 2022

✔️ Deploy Preview for pytorch-tutorials-preview ready!

🔨 Explore the source changes: fee1859

🔍 Inspect the deploy log: https://app.netlify.com/sites/pytorch-tutorials-preview/deploys/62284da5ef64b40007a2aecc

😎 Browse the preview: https://deploy-preview-1851--pytorch-tutorials-preview.netlify.app/advanced/cpp_extension

`type()` is depreciated and it looks like `device()` is appropriate
here. There are other `type` commands below and the error message says
that `option` can be a drop-in but I'm unsure if this is appropriate for
those calls.
@stevenwalton
Copy link
Contributor Author

Note here the second commit. I don't actually get warnings when compiling the code using gates.type() but the define directive said that type() was depreciated. I can make the changes to option() if that is actually the correct default.

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you for signing our Contributor License Agreement. We can now accept your code for this (and any) Meta Open Source project. Thanks!

Copy link
Contributor

@mrshenli mrshenli left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@mrshenli
Copy link
Contributor

mrshenli commented Mar 9, 2022

Hey @brianjo

The "urllib.error.HTTPError: HTTP Error 500: Internal Server Error" error seems irrelevant to this PR. Shall we merge?

@brianjo
Copy link
Contributor

brianjo commented Mar 9, 2022

Let me try to kick that worker first. :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants