-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 23.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use tools/print_test_stats.py in GHA #57647
Conversation
💊 CI failures summary and remediationsAs of commit b701767 (more details on the Dr. CI page):
🕵️ 1 new failure recognized by patternsThe following CI failures do not appear to be due to upstream breakages: pytorch_xla_linux_bionic_py3_6_clang9_build (1/1)Step: "Build" (full log | diagnosis details | 🔁 rerun)
|
Job | Step | Action |
---|---|---|
pytorch_linux_bionic_py3_8_gcc9_coverage_test2 | Run tests | 🔁 rerun |
pytorch_linux_xenial_cuda11_1_cudnn8_py3_gcc7_test2 | Run tests | 🔁 rerun |
This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI (expand for details).
Follow this link to opt-out of these comments for your Pull Requests.Please report bugs/suggestions to the (internal) Dr. CI Users group.
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #57647 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 76.83% 76.84% +0.01%
==========================================
Files 1986 1980 -6
Lines 197402 196877 -525
==========================================
- Hits 151668 151285 -383
+ Misses 45734 45592 -142 |
@samestep has imported this pull request. If you are a Facebook employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator. |
CIRCLE_PR_NUMBER: ${{ github.event.pull_request.number }} | ||
CIRCLE_SHA1: ${{ github.event.pull_request.head.sha || github.sha }} | ||
CIRCLE_TAG: ${{ steps.parse-ref.outputs.tag }} | ||
CIRCLE_WORKFLOW_ID: ${{ github.run_id }} # dunno if this corresponds |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What do we use this for?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
dunno; @walterddr do you happen to know?
Summary: Judging from pytorch#57584, it seems like the test-reports artifact was originally intended to be downloaded to `$PWD/test-reports` instead of just directly into `$PWD`. To minimize confusion, this PR changes it to download into `test/test-reports`, which should match where the files came from in the `test` step anyway. TODOs: - [x] change the extract path for test-reports - [x] install Python dependencies - [x] call `tools/print_test_stats.py` - [x] use deep clone to allow `git` commands - [x] correctly set `CIRCLE_*` environment variables - [x] set Scribe credentials - [x] set AWS credentials Pull Request resolved: pytorch#57647 Test Plan: CI. Reviewed By: seemethere Differential Revision: D28325833 Pulled By: samestep fbshipit-source-id: cc322bad76747f59b764a1a0a863153bb26095e7
Judging from #57584, it seems like the test-reports artifact was originally intended to be downloaded to
$PWD/test-reports
instead of just directly into$PWD
. To minimize confusion, this PR changes it to download intotest/test-reports
, which should match where the files came from in thetest
step anyway.TODOs:
tools/print_test_stats.py
git
commandsCIRCLE_*
environment variablesTest plan:
CI.