Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Split quantize_pt2 to allow calling the same APIs in testing and regular flows #4505

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

mcremon-meta
Copy link
Contributor

Summary:
Splitting quantize_pt2 into two steps: convert_pt2 and fuse_pt2. Convert will return the converted model after convert_pt2e, which allows getting reference outputs for testing. Fuse will return the final fused graph. Those calls should be always be using the same quantizer. Note that we will probably split the convert step again to allow calibration in a follow up diff.

quantize_pt2 is still the one-liner API, for anything that doesn't require converted reference outputs (so mostly for e2e testing).

Main benefit is that we can use the same API everywhere now, and things like decomposing SDPA and any other ATen IR passes that need to run before quantization can be done in one location (in convert_pt2).

Reviewed By: dulinriley

Differential Revision: D60544102

…lar flows

Summary:
Splitting `quantize_pt2` into two steps: `convert_pt2` and `fuse_pt2`. Convert will return the converted model after `convert_pt2e`, which allows getting reference outputs for testing. Fuse will return the final fused graph. Those calls should be always be using the same quantizer. Note that we will probably split the convert step again to allow calibration in a follow up diff.

`quantize_pt2` is still the one-liner API, for anything that doesn't require converted reference outputs (so mostly for e2e testing).

Main benefit is that we can use the same API everywhere now, and things like decomposing SDPA and any other ATen IR passes that need to run before quantization can be done in one location (in `convert_pt2`).

Reviewed By: dulinriley

Differential Revision: D60544102
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Aug 1, 2024

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/4505

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ No Failures

As of commit 7d13d4c with merge base a743a3b (image):
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. label Aug 1, 2024
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D60544102

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request has been merged in aa56e8c.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. fb-exported Merged
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants