Skip to content

[lint] reformat swizzle ops #2097

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 22, 2025
Merged

[lint] reformat swizzle ops #2097

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 22, 2025

Conversation

danielvegamyhre
Copy link
Contributor

I noticed this file was causing CI linter errors, so I made this PR to apply the linter changes.

Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Apr 22, 2025

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/ao/2097

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

⏳ 5 Pending, 3 Unrelated Failures

As of commit 2ebf0ba with merge base 2266451 (image):

FLAKY - The following job failed but was likely due to flakiness present on trunk:

BROKEN TRUNK - The following jobs failed but was present on the merge base:

👉 Rebase onto the `viable/strict` branch to avoid these failures

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. label Apr 22, 2025
@danielvegamyhre danielvegamyhre added the topic: not user facing Use this tag if you don't want this PR to show up in release notes label Apr 22, 2025
@danielvegamyhre danielvegamyhre merged commit 9af2a45 into main Apr 22, 2025
14 of 22 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. topic: not user facing Use this tag if you don't want this PR to show up in release notes
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants