Skip to content

cherry-pick/fix: Docs rendering on PyTorch site (#2440) #2441

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 10, 2023

Conversation

gs-olive
Copy link
Collaborator

@gs-olive gs-olive commented Nov 7, 2023

Description

Type of change

  • Cherry-pick of PR to release/2.1 branch

Checklist:

  • [ - ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project (You can use the linters)
  • [ - ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • [ - ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas and hacks
  • [ - ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • [ - ] I have added tests to verify my fix or my feature
  • [ - ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
  • [ - ] I have added the relevant labels to my PR in so that relevant reviewers are notified

@gs-olive gs-olive self-assigned this Nov 7, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Nov 7, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot requested a review from narendasan November 7, 2023 00:38
Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code conforms to Python style guidelines

Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code conforms to C++ style guidelines

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cla signed documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants