Skip to content

[CUTLASS] Include new cutlass support for groupwise mixed dtype grouped gemm. #3885

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed

Conversation

jwfromm
Copy link
Contributor

@jwfromm jwfromm commented Mar 26, 2025

This small PR updates FBGEMM's cutlass version to include new support for mixed dtype grouped gemm scaling. Supporting this groupwise scaling is important for upcoming OSS model releases and mirrors Meta's internal cutlass revision.

Copy link

netlify bot commented Mar 26, 2025

Deploy Preview for pytorch-fbgemm-docs ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit cb3a003
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/pytorch-fbgemm-docs/deploys/67e44e221d7dd90008ed7f18
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-3885--pytorch-fbgemm-docs.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@jwfromm has imported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@jwfromm merged this pull request in 00cd37b.

q10 pushed a commit to q10/FBGEMM that referenced this pull request Apr 10, 2025
…ytorch#977)

Summary:
Pull Request resolved: facebookresearch/FBGEMM#977

This small PR updates FBGEMM's cutlass version to include new support for mixed dtype grouped gemm scaling. Supporting this groupwise scaling is important for upcoming OSS model releases and mirrors Meta's internal cutlass revision.

X-link: pytorch#3885

Reviewed By: q10

Differential Revision: D71914731

Pulled By: jwfromm

fbshipit-source-id: 79789f61e3be31c2c04f1d05306552d06c0cb047
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants