-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.9k
Improve [Async]ContextDecorator type hinting #13416
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
97ffc0d
Improve [Async]ContextDecorator type hinting
ncoghlan 4b59fc8
Fix typo
ncoghlan 0757c3a
Inherit __call__ signature in decorator stub
ncoghlan d5d93d3
[pre-commit.ci] auto fixes from pre-commit.com hooks
pre-commit-ci[bot] d79f697
Remove no longer used TypeVar
ncoghlan 1fb52db
_R typevar replaced the last use of _F in contextlib.pyi
ncoghlan cebcc7e
Attempt to fix callable signature checks in jax
ncoghlan d804d44
Callable is a type form, not a type
ncoghlan File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why did you remove
__call__
here? Thedecorator
library explicitly adds it and it's not part of the inheritance tree:https://github.com/micheles/decorator/blob/519cc713878df4bfb768edfaa65e4bf2d875e421/src/decorator.py#L314-L318
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Because the stub tests failed complaining that the
__call__
definition here no longer conformed to the parent class declaration ofContextDecorator.__call__
(it was the same issue as injax
: the return type isn't the same as the input type, it just has the same call signature).Deleting the stub in the subclass means it inherits the
ContextDecorator.__call__
signature, which is also correct fordecorator.ContextManager
.I didn't check if the nominal signature of
decorator.decorate
itself might need updating, though.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I edited the PR description to include that additional information about the change fixing a genuine bug in the old signature definition.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Whoops, I missed some of the base classes of
_GeneratorContextManager
when checking (twice!).