Lint: Fix outstanding codespell spelling errors

[arhadthedev]

https://github.com/python/peps/actions/runs/4843117521/jobs/8630554766?pr=3128#step:5:87:

Check for common misspellings in text files..............................Failed
- hook id: codespell
- exit code: 65

pep-0642.rst:1702: recenty ==> recently
pep-0205.txt:189: referencable ==> referenceable
pep-0205.txt:213: referencable ==> referenceable
pep-0205.txt:213: referencable ==> referenceable
pep-0582.rst:49: depenencies ==> dependencies
pep-0652.rst:245: aded ==> added
pep-0653.rst:596: stategy ==> strategy
pep-0701.rst:379: withing ==> within
pep-0701.rst:439: withing ==> within
pep-0011.txt:45: plaforms ==> platforms
pep-0622.rst:2110: equilvalent ==> equivalent
pep-0670.rst:524: retreive ==> retrieve
pep-0426.txt:1287: overal ==> overall
pep-0708.rst:126: similiar ==> similar
pep-0526.txt:467: undocummented ==> undocumented
pep-0665.rst:58: producting ==> producing, production
pep-0285.txt:418: redability ==> readability
pep-0683.rst:27: implmentation ==> implementation
pep-0683.rst:706: speicific ==> specific
pep-0677.rst:1023: ot ==> to, of, or, not
pep-0677.rst:1118: compatiblity ==> compatibility
pep-0689.rst:42: requring ==> requiring
pep-0689.rst:133: exeption ==> exception, exemption
pep-0691.rst:87: reponses ==> responses
pep-0669.rst:121: Ancilliary ==> Ancillary
pep-0669.rst:425: neglible ==> negligible
pep-0674.rst:404: sufficently ==> sufficiently
pep-0684.rst:674: allcoators ==> allocators
pep-0690.rst:296: dictionay ==> dictionary
pep-0706.rst:541: wth ==> with
pep-0706.rst:572: dilligent ==> diligent
pep-0554.rst:481: inteded ==> intended

---

📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://pep-previews--3129.org.readthedocs.build/

[arhadthedev]

I cannot uncheck reviewers added from CODEOWNERS so my apologises for making more noise than required.

[arhadthedev]

Correction: I can but only after creating and undrafting a PR.

[AA-Turner]

To note, these were left unfixed in #3080, and we generally have a disinclination for mass typo-fix PRs. I'm not sure what the other editors think, though.

A

[hugovk]

Personally I'm fine with it, but as Adam said, we've generally avoided this sort of thing. And I recently suggested a typo fix to work around the repeated CI approval when iterating for a first-time contributor (#3095 (comment)).

But this PR is made now, we may as well merge it :)

[arhadthedev]

we generally have a disinclination for mass typo-fix PRs

I hope it's a once-in-a-lifetime fix. After that, we can change .github/workflows/lint.yml to not allow new typos to creep in:

-          extra_args: --all-files --hook-stage manual codespell || true
+          extra_args: --all-files --hook-stage manual codespell

Edit: should I add the modification of lint.yml into this PR?

[hugovk]

No thanks, when this was added, we didn't want to enforce spellcheck on CI due to false positives: #2075 (comment) / #2075 (comment) / #2151 (review) / #2151 (comment) / etc.

[CAM-Gerlach]

LGTM now, though seems like others have already done the hard work of reviewing this. As others have mentioned, we don't really want to encourage these kind of mass-typo-fix PR, but we may as well merge it. Hopefully they will be less common now that #3080 was implemented, though that thought might be rather optimistic and this will be a perpetual problem.