Skip to content

Conversation

@markshannon
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

Copy link
Member

@brandtbucher brandtbucher left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, looks good. I left a few comments as I read through:

pep-0659.rst Outdated
Comment on lines 308 to 309
In summary, for most applications where many of the functions are relatively
relatively unused, 3.11 will consume more memory than 3.10, but not by much.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
In summary, for most applications where many of the functions are relatively
relatively unused, 3.11 will consume more memory than 3.10, but not by much.
In summary, for most applications where many of the functions are relatively
unused, 3.11 will consume more memory than 3.10, but not by much.

@CAM-Gerlach CAM-Gerlach changed the title PEP 659: Update to describe inline caches. PEP 659: Update to describe inline caches Mar 23, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants