New type inference: add support for upper bounds and values #15813
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
According to mypy_primer, this change doesn't affect type check results on a corpus of open source code. ✅ |
|
I have the next PR in the batch ( |
JukkaL
approved these changes
Aug 9, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is a third PR in series following #15287 and #15754. This one is quite simple: I just add basic support for polymorphic inference involving type variables with upper bounds and values. A complete support would be quite complicated, and it will be a corner case to already rare situation. Finally, it is written in a way that is easy to tune in the future.
I also use this PR to add some unit tests for all three PRs so far, other two PRs only added integration tests (and I clean up existing unit tests as well).