Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

gh-94808: Coverage: Test uppercase string literal prefixes #95925

Merged

Conversation

mdboom
Copy link
Contributor

@mdboom mdboom commented Aug 12, 2022

self.assertEqual(eval(r""" R'\x01' """), '\\x01')
self.assertEqual(eval(r""" BR'\x01' """), b'\\' + b'x01')
self.assertEqual(eval(""" F'{1+1}' """), '2')
self.assertEqual(eval(""" U'\U0001d120' """), '\U0001d120')
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Presumably the lowercase versions are covered by other tests (right?)

Would it be simpler here to just assert in each case that the lowercase and upper case prefixes generate the same thing? For instance, self.assertEqual(eval(""" F'{1+1}' """), eval(""" f'{1+1}' """)).

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That's a good idea. Updated.

@iritkatriel
Copy link
Member

self.assertEqual(eval(r""" R'\x01' """), r'\x01')
self.assertEqual(eval(r""" BR'\x01' """), br'\x01')
self.assertEqual(eval(""" F'{1+1}' """), f'{1+1}')
self.assertEqual(eval(""" U'\U0001d120' """), u'\U0001d120')
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actually do we need the eval() calls?

@serhiy-storchaka serhiy-storchaka merged commit f00383e into python:main Sep 24, 2022
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @mdboom for the PR, and @serhiy-storchaka for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.11.
🐍🍒⛏🤖

@bedevere-bot
Copy link

GH-97518 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.11 branch.

miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull request Sep 24, 2022
…honGH-95925)

(cherry picked from commit f00383e)

Co-authored-by: Michael Droettboom <mdboom@gmail.com>
miss-islington added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 25, 2022
(cherry picked from commit f00383e)

Co-authored-by: Michael Droettboom <mdboom@gmail.com>
@serhiy-storchaka serhiy-storchaka added the needs backport to 3.10 only security fixes label Sep 25, 2022
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @mdboom for the PR, and @serhiy-storchaka for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.10.
🐍🍒⛏🤖

@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot removed the needs backport to 3.10 only security fixes label Sep 25, 2022
@bedevere-bot
Copy link

GH-97537 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.10 branch.

miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull request Sep 25, 2022
…honGH-95925)

(cherry picked from commit f00383e)

Co-authored-by: Michael Droettboom <mdboom@gmail.com>
miss-islington added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 25, 2022
(cherry picked from commit f00383e)

Co-authored-by: Michael Droettboom <mdboom@gmail.com>
@mdboom mdboom deleted the coverage-upper-case-literal-prefixes branch December 22, 2022 15:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
skip news tests Tests in the Lib/test dir
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants