Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

gh-92611: Clarify planned removal version in PEP 594-deprecated modules #92793

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 20, 2022

Conversation

CAM-Gerlach
Copy link
Member

@CAM-Gerlach CAM-Gerlach commented May 14, 2022

As discussed in #92611 and #92564 and as a followup to PR #92612 , this 3.11+ only PR uses the proper deprecated-removed role for the modules deprecated by PEP 593 (PEP-594) to clearly indicate to users that a removal version is planned and what it is, so they can prepare accordingly or voice any unanticipated impacts.

Related to #92792 ; if we decide to backport that PR, the upgrade to using deprecated-removed on those functions can be moved to this one.

Automerge-Triggered-By: GH:brettcannon

@CAM-Gerlach CAM-Gerlach requested review from ethanfurman and a team as code owners May 14, 2022 00:05
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot added docs Documentation in the Doc dir awaiting review labels May 14, 2022
@CAM-Gerlach CAM-Gerlach requested review from brettcannon and removed request for a team and ethanfurman May 14, 2022 00:05
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @CAM-Gerlach for the PR 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.11.
🐍🍒⛏🤖

miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull request May 20, 2022
… modules (pythonGH-92793)

As discussed in pythonGH-92611 and pythonGH-92564 and as a followup to PR pythonGH-92612 , this 3.11+ only PR uses the proper `deprecated-removed` role for the modules deprecated by PEP 593 (PEP-594) to clearly indicate to users that a removal version is planned and what it is, so they can prepare accordingly or voice any unanticipated impacts.

Related to pythonGH-92792 ; if we decide to backport that PR, the upgrade to using `deprecated-removed` on those functions can be moved to this one.
(cherry picked from commit 31fa41e)

Co-authored-by: CAM Gerlach <CAM.Gerlach@Gerlach.CAM>
@bedevere-bot
Copy link

GH-93026 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.11 branch.

@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot removed the needs backport to 3.11 only security fixes label May 20, 2022
brettcannon pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 20, 2022
…es (GH-92793) (GH-93026)

As discussed in GH-92611 and GH-92564 and as a followup to PR GH-92612 , this 3.11+ only PR uses the proper `deprecated-removed` role for the modules deprecated by PEP 593 (PEP-594) to clearly indicate to users that a removal version is planned and what it is, so they can prepare accordingly or voice any unanticipated impacts.

Related to GH-92792 ; if we decide to backport that PR, the upgrade to using `deprecated-removed` on those functions can be moved to this one.
(cherry picked from commit 31fa41e)

Co-authored-by: CAM Gerlach <CAM.Gerlach@Gerlach.CAM>
rhettinger pushed a commit to rhettinger/cpython that referenced this pull request Jul 7, 2022
… modules (pythonGH-92793)

As discussed in python#92611 and python#92564 and as a followup to PR python#92612 , this 3.11+ only PR uses the proper `deprecated-removed` role for the modules deprecated by PEP 593 (PEP-594) to clearly indicate to users that a removal version is planned and what it is, so they can prepare accordingly or voice any unanticipated impacts.

Related to python#92792 ; if we decide to backport that PR, the upgrade to using `deprecated-removed` on those functions can be moved to this one.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
docs Documentation in the Doc dir skip news
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants